Life after death after life?

[AznMagic]

Well i dont believe the earth is more than 6000 years old. And if it was than why is there nothing that ages over 6000 years old. No human history i mean. And when i say 6000 years, i actually mean 6000-10000...around there.

we've been able to find carbon materials in rocks in greenland, suggesting microscopic life in the precambrian period.  only the stupidest of idiots will believe the earth is less than 10 thousand years old.

also, oldest living organism
http://www.extremescience.com/OldestLivingThing.htm

250 million years seem like a lot more than 10 thousand years.

and if you don't count suspended animation as living, there's this.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-1064546.html

11 thousand year old bacteria.  that's just one generation of organisms.

and that's just for evidence using organisms.

[Tito]

Your right when you say the population is changing, but thats variation. It doesnt prove evolution as true.

that IS evolution

And Ed evolution has not been proven, and it has never been observed.

evolution is a FACT.  there is no difference b/w "macro" and "micro" evolution.  i think what you're looking for is that "speciation" has never been observed, but it has, both in the laboratory and the field.

You say we share a common ancestor with apes. I say we share a common creater.

i don't think anyone else is ruling out the possibility.  YOUR static worldview is damaged by evolution.  evolution doesn't say a damned thing for or against some kind of creator

Normally I would say something, but I really think mr. burress has said all that needs to be said.

@Royalfreakiness: what perverse deity dictates belief that cages the human mind? The bible and the quran are books just as Ulysses, the Iliad, and Blood Meridian are books. Use your own capacity for language to dictate your mind, stop looking at the world through the eyes of turning pages -- draw your own conclusions, create your own pages.

just curious did you read about Evolution or are documentaries different?

we didn't evolve from monkeys.  if you wanna trace us back to anything that look like monkeys, u'd have to go back at least 30 million years.  we share common ancestors with apes.

of course we share some common attributes but that doesn't necessarily mean we evolved from them

go back 30 Million years! How?

monkeys have tails.  no hominid to my recollection have ever had tails.  we branched off from that long before we branched off from apes to become hominids.

Apples and Pears have alot in common
50 Million years ago Pears use to be apples but with time they evolved into Pears.
Some 'cursed' apples where condemned to a life of circleism

[a;sdlfkjas;df]

just curious did you read about Evolution or are documentaries different?

 :lol:

yes, guy ritchie is about as reputable as charles darwin.  i don't see how you can't see the difference b/w a work of literature and (rigorously repeated--this is key) documented physical observations

it's all a game.  mr. gold runs this bitch

[Tito]

i know a fact when i see one
EVOLUTION is not a fact
its a MYTH

[TJ Hooker]

^^ only reason people evolve is because of interracial sex , ha haaaa yeah  :thumbsup:

I love em all, asians, latinas, my east O black honeys, and especially that vanilla na im talking about ?? you know what im sayin right? youknowwhatimsayinman yeee.  :3some:

but on the real tip, interracial sex=evolution.

[L_I_S]

Apples and Pears have alot in common
50 Million years ago Pears use to be apples but with time they evolved into Pears.
Some 'cursed' apples where condemned to a life of circleism

bhahahahaha

well...according to the bible the earth is 6000 human years old. day 1 wen god created such and such, time(human years) didnt exist. theres nothing that says millions of days past. soz i cant remember how 2 explain it properly, but i think u get wat i mean.

[Jono]

I get what you mean elias

If we evolved from fish, bacteria...wateva we came from billions and billions years ago. That means trees, plants, the elements etc, would of had to come from the same substance what we evolved from. Does this mean we are related to rocks and trees? Has there been any documentation of a rock evolving into a tree? Or a banana into a dog? Hmmmm....

[VG]

Evolution is a damn fact and has been recognised as a fact modern creationist theory does not argue against evolution it argues that god created the first thing that then evolved into something else.

[TheGodEmperor]

I get what you mean elias

If we evolved from fish, bacteria...wateva we came from billions and billions years ago. That means trees, plants, the elements etc, would of had to come from the same substance what we evolved from. Does this mean we are related to rocks and trees? Has there been any documentation of a rock evolving into a tree? Or a banana into a dog? Hmmmm....

are you stupid? Those species have already branched off...

@tito: I've read The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins, I've read loads of books on the origin of man (paleo anthropology textbooks, In the Footsteps of Eve -- which is actually not about religion at all), and I've perused On the Origin of the Species  :thumbsup:

[cigar omar]

I don't believe that the earth is 6000 years old. We really can't prove how old it is. Saying that I also don't believe my ancestors where Apes, fish or Bacteria its a ludicrous statement. To just assume the earth, the planets and the moon just happened accidentally. Its too complex and perfect of a system, Just looking at the human body is too complex to have happened accidentally.

At the end of the day your quick to dismiss religion as just being 'a theory that someone came up with'. What about all these other theories that are named after the people that came up with them. Aren't they just theories also there is proof of the person came up with it.

 

[^_^]

I don't believe that the earth is 6000 years old. We really can't prove how old it is. Saying that I also don't believe my ancestors where Apes, fish or Bacteria its a ludicrous statement. To just assume the earth, the planets and the moon just happened accidentally. Its too complex and perfect of a system, Just looking at the human body is too complex to have happened accidentally.

At the end of the day your quick to dismiss religion as just being 'a theory that someone came up with'. What about all these other theories that are named after the people that came up with them. Aren't they just theories also there is proof of the person came up with it.

 

there isn't really any "not-proof" (if i can say this) either. it is what it is.

i agree for the most part

religion isn't theory.  a theory is a concept that hasn't been fully verified (which religion can't really be), but if verified would explain phenomena.

[a;sdlfkjas;df]

I get what you mean elias

If we evolved from fish, bacteria...wateva we came from billions and billions years ago. That means trees, plants, the elements etc, would of had to come from the same substance what we evolved from. Does this mean we are related to rocks and trees? Has there been any documentation of a rock evolving into a tree? Or a banana into a dog? Hmmmm....

 :lol: