you mean it was too deep for you? complicated?
clearly it was too deep for you if you didn't understand my post...
Preachy: as in, he was throwing his view in our faces instead of using any artfulness or literary tecnique....he was just saying 'this is what I think' his ideas weren't bad, although not particularly new or interesting per se...it would've been better if he'd carried them across with more subtlety using allusion, imagery, symbolism, etc....the only technique that he used effectively was anthropomorphism, which I thought was quite neatly done....the humanized anmals carried an interesting message, the only one in the entire book really