soccer strategy

[TheGodEmperor]

give us your opinion tito.

dont you hate it when coaches make bad tactical changes. example when inter where losing to liverpool instead of bringing in a cherrypicking stricker he brange in cruz. and in the first leg stankovic was playing terrible. he could have brang in figo because inter needed somebody to set up the strickers in the match

what he should've done was put on Crespo or Suazo along with Ibrahimovic and play 4-3-2 with one defensive-mid and to wide players and have suazo or crespo abit behind Ibrahimovic. and as for the first leg it wasn't stankovic fault it more luck for Liverpool than anything

I agree, but inter's coach isnt ready for that much attack yet. He was still hoping to pop in a couple off of counter attacks

[Tito]

give us your opinion tito.

dont you hate it when coaches make bad tactical changes. example when inter where losing to liverpool instead of bringing in a cherrypicking stricker he brange in cruz. and in the first leg stankovic was playing terrible. he could have brang in figo because inter needed somebody to set up the strickers in the match

what he should've done was put on Crespo or Suazo along with Ibrahimovic and play 4-3-2 with one defensive-mid and to wide players and have suazo or crespo abit behind Ibrahimovic. and as for the first leg it wasn't stankovic fault it more luck for Liverpool than anything

I agree

see i told you i can manage

[moby]

yeah its because inter was trying to stay with their defend-counter attack style that does not work so well against well rounded teams

but when they conceded he could have began to play more attaking. you lost the match anyway so why not try to get a goal

[TheGodEmperor]

yeah its because inter was trying to stay with their defend-counter attack style that does not work so well against well rounded teams

but when they conceded he could have began to play more attaking. you lost the match anyway so why not try to get a goal

he SHOULD have, but he didnt, because he was hoping his counter attack would work out for him  :dontknow:

[Tito]

yeah its because inter was trying to stay with their defend-counter attack style that does not work so well against well rounded teams

but when they conceded he could have began to play more attaking. you lost the match anyway so why not try to get a goal

and why not concede more 

[TheGodEmperor]

yeah its because inter was trying to stay with their defend-counter attack style that does not work so well against well rounded teams

but when they conceded he could have began to play more attaking. you lost the match anyway so why not try to get a goal

and why not concede more 

his point was that they plyed to conservatively from behind and it ended up costing them the game.

[moby]

well he already conceded more

[TheGodEmperor]

How do you guys think barca should play Man U and vice versa?

[Tito]

i think Man U will be more defensive seeing they have a crunch match against Chelsea and then the second leg all in 7 days
i think Barca have nothing to play for in the La Liga and will come out with the finger on their trigger and go all out
in all i think the game will finish 0-0 or 1-1, 2 goal will be scored max maybe by one team or 1 each

[TheGodEmperor]

I am gonna agree. I think that Man U will play 4-4-2, with at least 1 defensive mid, and barca will play with all attacking mids

[Tito]

i expect Barca to play 4-3-2-1

[TheGodEmperor]

i expect Barca to play 4-3-2-1

which means attacking mids  :thumbsup: