New Tricks - Xatw, aXatw, Xaatw, Seed Move

[oLi]

There is no such thing as "axatw"

so...this trick is the first that hasn' t a name...

The name of the trick is arratw

ok...so, what's the name of "seed" move??

seed atw is hatw - ratw(in) nt...


and axatw doesent exist, its ilogical, if we follow that nameology, then tatw should be called cross atw, and its not like that......

cmon, its just a fucking ratw (in), just as matw is tatw(in)
its just nonsense.... like I said before, putting the "in" variation of tatw an extra name (matw) was just retard, it should never have happened, but it just happened and its too late to change it.....

Seed Move is hatw - aratw(in) nt, bro

Why did u say that aXatw doesn't exist? call it aRatw (in) if u prefer, but it does exist..
I know that the difference between matw and Tatw is subtle ...but, for example, between amatw and atatw the difference is huge, isn't it?

there are two possibilities:
we can keep matw and also xatw or remove both.. why should exist only one of them? this is not a question of name.. it's a question of coherence, doesn't it?

by the way...thanks to all...peace  :thumbsup:

[{++ } Lukas fs {++}]

There is no such thing as "axatw"

so...this trick is the first that hasn' t a name...

The name of the trick is arratw

ok...so, what's the name of "seed" move??

seed atw is hatw - ratw(in) nt...


and axatw doesent exist, its ilogical, if we follow that nameology, then tatw should be called cross atw, and its not like that......

cmon, its just a fucking ratw (in), just as matw is tatw(in)
its just nonsense.... like I said before, putting the "in" variation of tatw an extra name (matw) was just retard, it should never have happened, but it just happened and its too late to change it.....

Seed Move is hatw - aratw(in) nt, bro

Why did u say that aXatw doesn't exist? call it aRatw (in) if u prefer, but it does exist..
I know that the difference between matw and Tatw is subtle ...but, for example, between amatw and atatw the difference is huge, isn't it?

there are two possibilities:
we can keep matw and also xatw or remove both.. why should exist only one of them? this is not a question of name.. it's a question of coherence, doesn't it?

by the way...thanks to all...peace  :thumbsup:

by "it dont exist" I meant the name doesent exist and wont ever exist.. "xatw"(wich doesent exist) is just a stupid revratw
even you said it..."Seed Move is hatw - aratw(in) nt, bro"

LOOL

[NeN]

Yeah great skills. If we look them like tatw and matw, then they are different than Ratw. So i'm not sure about that name, i think i've done it before, and for sure, more freestylers did it long time before me, provably Palle was one of them. If we search, sure we'll get an old video with some of this skills.

[Seed]

There is no such thing as "axatw"

so...this trick is the first that hasn' t a name...

The name of the trick is arratw

ok...so, what's the name of "seed" move??

seed atw is hatw - ratw(in) nt...


and axatw doesent exist, its ilogical, if we follow that nameology, then tatw should be called cross atw, and its not like that......

cmon, its just a fucking ratw (in), just as matw is tatw(in)
its just nonsense.... like I said before, putting the "in" variation of tatw an extra name (matw) was just retard, it should never have happened, but it just happened and its too late to change it.....

Seed Move is hatw - aratw(in) nt, bro

Why did u say that aXatw doesn't exist? call it aRatw (in) if u prefer, but it does exist..
I know that the difference between matw and Tatw is subtle ...but, for example, between amatw and atatw the difference is huge, isn't it?

there are two possibilities:
we can keep matw and also xatw or remove both.. why should exist only one of them? this is not a question of name.. it's a question of coherence, doesn't it?

by the way...thanks to all...peace  :thumbsup:

by "it dont exist" I meant the name doesent exist and wont ever exist.. "xatw"(wich doesent exist) is just a stupid revratw
even you said it..."Seed Move is hatw - aratw(in) nt, bro"

LOOL

seed move should have been "hatw axatw nt"...but i didn't write "axatw" cause u said it' doesn't exists...so i wrote "aratw(in)"
btw...let's finish this debate...
as luki said...fuck the names  :hello:

[flav]

the name IS axatw(arratw) for the same reason why eldo atw is called eldo atw and not reverse skala atw. :cursing:

[duckar]

biggie smalls yo

[Zealot1992]

new for me...good skills :thumbsup:

[chevestiano]

come on people, if we start naming every combo after us we would have like a million tricks now, for example, someone does atw-amatw-atatw-satw... and so on, and, because this is a new combo that no one has done, the person has to name the "trick" with his name, for me is just a combo