There is no such thing as "axatw"
so...this trick is the first that hasn' t a name...
The name of the trick is arratw
ok...so, what's the name of "seed" move??
seed atw is hatw - ratw(in) nt...
and axatw doesent exist, its ilogical, if we follow that nameology, then tatw should be called cross atw, and its not like that......
cmon, its just a fucking ratw (in), just as matw is tatw(in)
its just nonsense.... like I said before, putting the "in" variation of tatw an extra name (matw) was just retard, it should never have happened, but it just happened and its too late to change it.....
Seed Move is hatw - aratw(in) nt, bro
Why did u say that aXatw doesn't exist? call it aRatw (in) if u prefer, but it does exist..
I know that the difference between matw and Tatw is subtle ...but, for example, between amatw and atatw the difference is huge, isn't it?
there are two possibilities:
we can keep matw and also xatw or remove both.. why should exist only one of them? this is not a question of name.. it's a question of coherence, doesn't it?
by the way...thanks to all...peace :thumbsup: