Idea for a new trick but is it possible ?

[TW89]

prove it. :dontknow:

ok sorry for dissing your heros the polish freestylers but if you are not able to prove it then it didnt happen. otherwise i could say that i thought of this variation long before the polish freestylers.

So I jus walked over a river today, but just because I cant prove it you're saying it didnt happen?
I can assure you I did.

[L_I_S]

prove it. :dontknow:

ok sorry for dissing your heros the polish freestylers but if you are not able to prove it then it didnt happen. otherwise i could say that i thought of this variation long before the polish freestylers.

So I jus walked over a river today, but just because I cant prove it you're saying it didnt happen?
I can assure you I did.

i think hes trying 2 give oli a taste of his own medicine coz he always says no proof=didnt happen or somethin like dat.

[Max]

prove it. :dontknow:

ok sorry for dissing your heros the polish freestylers but if you are not able to prove it then it didnt happen. otherwise i could say that i thought of this variation long before the polish freestylers.

So I jus walked over a river today, but just because I cant prove it you're saying it didnt happen?
I can assure you I did.

i think hes trying 2 give oli a taste of his own medicine coz he always says no proof=didnt happen or somethin like dat.

jep thanks.

[oLi]

The idea already exists since long back and a couple of polish freestylers have tried but from what I know nobody has done it yet

prove it. :dontknow:

ok sorry for dissing your heros the polish freestylers but if you are not able to prove it then it didnt happen. otherwise i could say that i thought of this variation long before the polish freestylers.

Nice one m4x. My ownage count on this forum is already so high number 2 aint even at nowhere near my count after being square rooted, therefore I can't be bothered with you right now.

Important exam tomorrow, auf wider~!

[imagestyles]

another one we were trying was lemmens around the moon, anyone think so?

o_O
if i did that i wouldnt call it LATM, thats just stupid.

I was planning on doing that in my next video and I would call it latm, it's not that stupid of a name

it is, just because latw is 2 revolutions with ur leg, doesnt mean that applies to how many revolutions u do with ur head. it should have a completely different name. GL doing it in ur vid.

keeping it as latm would be more simple and there would be one less name to remember
i think people are getting too obsessed with creating a new move and putting there name to it rather than a name that makes sense (not talking about you)
and 2 revolutions is 2 revolutions whether it's with your leg or head

idk man, being the first to do that trick and giving it a name 2 a person that has nothing 2 do with it feels wrong. i mean the guy doesnt even get recognition that it was him who did the trick first. well, if u do it u can call it watever u want. but maybe if others do it b4 u, they mite name it differently.

btw remembering more names, come on, memory is unlimited, wat have u got 2 loose...

I've seen Dkp Pull this off.

[TW89]

prove it. :dontknow:

ok sorry for dissing your heros the polish freestylers but if you are not able to prove it then it didnt happen. otherwise i could say that i thought of this variation long before the polish freestylers.

So I jus walked over a river today, but just because I cant prove it you're saying it didnt happen?
I can assure you I did.

i think hes trying 2 give oli a taste of his own medicine coz he always says no proof=didnt happen or somethin like dat.

jep thanks.

Oh right haha fair enuff.

[IWannaBeChuckNorris]

another one we were trying was lemmens around the moon, anyone think so?

o_O
if i did that i wouldnt call it LATM, thats just stupid.

I was planning on doing that in my next video and I would call it latm, it's not that stupid of a name

it is, just because latw is 2 revolutions with ur leg, doesnt mean that applies to how many revolutions u do with ur head. it should have a completely different name. GL doing it in ur vid.

keeping it as latm would be more simple and there would be one less name to remember
i think people are getting too obsessed with creating a new move and putting there name to it rather than a name that makes sense (not talking about you)
and 2 revolutions is 2 revolutions whether it's with your leg or head

idk man, being the first to do that trick and giving it a name 2 a person that has nothing 2 do with it feels wrong. i mean the guy doesnt even get recognition that it was him who did the trick first. well, if u do it u can call it watever u want. but maybe if others do it b4 u, they mite name it differently.

btw remembering more names, come on, memory is unlimited, wat have u got 2 loose...

I've seen Dkp Pull this off.

show me
i've seen him do one that looks like a filip atw without the touzani part of course

[NeN]

I think this trick would be better if you do first the magellan and then the inside Latw nt.

[L_I_S]

I think this trick would be better if you do first the magellan and the inside Latw nt.

that would be sick! som1 hardcore should try that

[Mace 16]

He means Outside latw - htw (nt) all with the same leg (obvsly preferably strong leg). So a 'big' airy high latw outside the when the ball is in the air pretty high up after two revolutions the one more revolution to finish off but the other (inside) way like a htw (nt). a magellan you do one atw eg outside atw then with no touch put your leg rund the other way so htw(nt) on cud say. what josh is saying is do two atw's (latw) and then with no touch put leg round the ball the other way so agne htw(nt). In the end its 3 revolutions like a PATW how ever shud be much harder as your leg is changing direction for the last revolution.

I think it's possible with the right technique, balance and practise. its all about timing and putting height on the latw so there is room for another revolution. :thumbsup:

i wrote like an essay lol but ive thought the trick through well :rockit: