Poll

Who would you take to college?

The Boy
The Girl
Other Answer

Author Topic: Classic Question  (Read 9437 times)

Offline Tito

  • APATW & PMATW
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,720
  • Reputation: 4993
  • SUCK IT
    • View Profile
Classic Question
« on: May 09, 2008, 07:34: PM »
I'm not sure if any of yous have ever been asked the same question but a few years ago i have and just wanted to know what your answers would be (post explanation for your answer)

If you were a father with two kids, one girl and one boy, from a developing country, broke (cheap/ money less) and you got lucky in tattsloto and you only had enough money to take one of your kids to college. Who would you pick the girl or the boy?

as i said earlier explain why you chose that answer.

you ain't the greatest until your most hated

Offline SeBaS

  • PATW & LTATW
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,123
  • Reputation: 1514
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2008, 09:04: PM »
ill take the girl and the boy will become a football player  :cheers: :dontknow:

Offline Jono

  • PATW & LTATW
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,485
  • Reputation: 2049
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2008, 09:20: PM »
It depends, i would pay for the child that is less smart, and hope that the other one would get good enough marks to get a scholarship to get into a college for free
Mr. T once fought superman over a bet to see who was stronger. The loser had to wear their underwear on the outside of their clothes.


Offline Tito

  • APATW & PMATW
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,720
  • Reputation: 4993
  • SUCK IT
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2008, 09:26: PM »
this is under circumstances which you don't know which is smarter

i would take the boy because you wouldn't want to waste on someone who is most likely to become a housewife/husband and you don't see too many househusbands

you ain't the greatest until your most hated

Offline oLi

  • APATW & PMATW
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,142
  • Reputation: 3639
  • youtube.com/oliveroo
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2008, 09:30: PM »
Whoever is more ambitious
Fx blesses himself before a patw combo, Tiernan blesses himself before a neck to sole transition.... but hey thats next generation :rolleyes:
I was going to be there...but now I'm not going to be there

Offline Jono

  • PATW & LTATW
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,485
  • Reputation: 2049
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2008, 09:35: PM »
this is under circumstances which you don't know which is smarter

i would take the boy because you wouldn't want to waste on someone who is most likely to become a housewife/husband and you don't see too many househusbands

Then i would do it for the boy. Girls are ussually smarter, and work harder in school.
Mr. T once fought superman over a bet to see who was stronger. The loser had to wear their underwear on the outside of their clothes.


Offline sputnik

  • PATW & LTATW
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,541
  • Reputation: 1926
  • ^^ This is Mike. Be nice to Mike. ^^
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2008, 09:39: PM »
the boy, obviously. girls have no use.

Offline Tito

  • APATW & PMATW
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,720
  • Reputation: 4993
  • SUCK IT
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #7 on: May 09, 2008, 09:41: PM »
the boy, obviously. girls have no use.
no need for sexism
but please explain

you ain't the greatest until your most hated

Offline sputnik

  • PATW & LTATW
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,541
  • Reputation: 1926
  • ^^ This is Mike. Be nice to Mike. ^^
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #8 on: May 09, 2008, 09:43: PM »
its a fact. in many developing areas, girls are of no use, in China they killed girls, in Africa they had many children to get more boys to provide for the family.

Offline Tito

  • APATW & PMATW
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,720
  • Reputation: 4993
  • SUCK IT
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #9 on: May 09, 2008, 09:46: PM »
its a fact. in many developing areas, girls are of no use, in China they killed girls, in Africa they had many children to get more boys to provide for the family.
and obviously the boys would exist is there were no girls unless women gave birth to fully developed women
that post was just stupid girls are equal to boys it may vary but most boys are pretty stupid compared to girls

you ain't the greatest until your most hated

Offline sputnik

  • PATW & LTATW
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,541
  • Reputation: 1926
  • ^^ This is Mike. Be nice to Mike. ^^
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2008, 09:53: PM »
i have to say: duh.

the point of that post was about the point of this topic. sending a child to college. obviously im not sexist, or think girls arent equal to boys or have no use, but in the situation you described? of choosing a girl or a boy to send to college? in a developing country? i stick by my guns, in that situation, sending a girl to college is no use, their opportunitys are even less equal that in developed countries, it is a complete waste of your money.

Offline Tito

  • APATW & PMATW
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,720
  • Reputation: 4993
  • SUCK IT
    • View Profile
Re: Classic Question
« Reply #11 on: May 09, 2008, 09:57: PM »
i'm going to have to disagree with you again the girl could get a very job
while the boy becomes a bricklayer or some other job even tho i said the boy too because the girl will eventually become a housewife i still think its a 50/50 gamble

you ain't the greatest until your most hated