We have disabled posting and registrations. Feel free to browse the historic Beyond Football content.
What's wrong with .png format?
Quote from: youthedog4 on Nov 13, 2011, 01:49: AMWhat's wrong with .png format?Unnecessarily big and should be reserved for pictures with high detail needed, not for desktop backgrounds ;)@Kako THPS3
Quote from: L_I_S on Nov 14, 2011, 03:23: PMQuote from: youthedog4 on Nov 13, 2011, 01:49: AMWhat's wrong with .png format?Unnecessarily big and should be reserved for pictures with high detail needed, not for desktop backgrounds ;)@Kako THPS3 If I put it in .jpeg format it would have been not much less than the .png so it really didn't matter.
Quote from: youthedog4 on Nov 15, 2011, 08:41: AMQuote from: L_I_S on Nov 14, 2011, 03:23: PMQuote from: youthedog4 on Nov 13, 2011, 01:49: AMWhat's wrong with .png format?Unnecessarily big and should be reserved for pictures with high detail needed, not for desktop backgrounds ;)@Kako THPS3 If I put it in .jpeg format it would have been not much less than the .png so it really didn't matter.Impossible. I put mine in png format and it was 4.5mb+ instead of the 370kb which allowed me to upload directly to bf without the use of a host site.
Quote from: L_I_S on Nov 15, 2011, 02:52: PMQuote from: youthedog4 on Nov 15, 2011, 08:41: AMQuote from: L_I_S on Nov 14, 2011, 03:23: PMQuote from: youthedog4 on Nov 13, 2011, 01:49: AMWhat's wrong with .png format?Unnecessarily big and should be reserved for pictures with high detail needed, not for desktop backgrounds ;)@Kako THPS3 If I put it in .jpeg format it would have been not much less than the .png so it really didn't matter.Impossible. I put mine in png format and it was 4.5mb+ instead of the 370kb which allowed me to upload directly to bf without the use of a host site.Well that is your case. Mine was different.
