You are comparing an out and out striker to a wide player using GOALS as the comparison :lol: I'm sorry, it's just so funny, really it is. This is where you fail to understand the game. You take numbers and use them to judge everything.
Cannavarro didn't have enough goals to win the award in 2006 :cursing:
Canavaro didn't deserve it either in 06. Tell me than what did Roanldo do that Drogba didn't. Clearly Drogba was far more prominent for his team. Strikers are meant to score goals and score goals he did, very important goals as well. So why not use goals as an argument. Goals win games and won games equal trophies and awards. Stop avoiding the point. Nice try, maybe next time.
And what impact did Drogba have as a wide player? Was he an effective wide player? Ronaldo was. Ronaldo was actually the best wide player in England, and has been for the past three years. So tell me, how often did Drogba effectively take players on out wide for his team?
So you have the best wide player in England and the best striker in England. Fuck it, let's see who scored more goals and call him better, right?

Ronaldo is just a better player, period. He has better talent, better crossing, better dribbling ability, and is an overall better attacking force. Sure, Drogba scored more goals, but what can you expect from an out and out striker. Again I stress the fact that van Nistelrooy had over 33 goals last but no one talks about him deserving it. Why? Because, although he has a great ability to score goals, as an overall player and effective attacking force, he isn't as good as, let's say, Ronaldo. When Drogba gets the ball outside of the box, you can't really expect much from him. When Ronaldo gets the ball outside or inside of the box, opponents are scared. This is a fact. Drogba is an out and out striker, I would hope he had more goals than Ronaldo. If he didn't (doesn't :biggrin:), it's actually pretty embarassing. So do you think Adebayor should win it this year? He's got 30 goals. That's not too bad is it? Goals, Goals, Goals!!