what is the longest lower combo in freestyle football???

[26spyker]

palle is famous for tatw amatw nt, not for (atw co nt - htw co nt) nt..
live with the convention

[10RonaldoC]

You think they look the same?
Maybe when I did it, it wasn't clear. Look for a video by Szymo called training. At 1:30, he does a clear atw - co nt -combo.
Can I ask, can you do tatw AND atw-co nt?

what???
i said the PRINCIPLE is the same, but it looks VERY different, tatw looks better and faster
btw of course i can do tatw but i have never tried atw-co (nt) because i don´t really need it if i can do tatw

[Ricke]

^ The principle isn't really the same because in tatw you're combining atw and co into one movement. Doing just atw and co, this IS slower because they are 2 different tricks and you have more time to prepare for co after getting the touch on the atw.

Sorry if im missunderstanding you.

[10RonaldoC]

^ The principle isn't really the same because in tatw you're combining atw and co into one movement. Doing just atw and co, this IS slower because they are 2 different tricks and you have more time to prepare for co after getting the touch on the atw.

Sorry if im missunderstanding you.

yea the difference is, that tatw is one movement and the foot u do the tatw with touches the ground after the co part and not after the atw and when ur doing atw - co (nt) ur foot touches the ground after the atw

[samfs]

umm I think that the principle is the same because its atw-co nt, just that tatw is atw-co nt no ground touch, and atw-co (normal way) is with a ground touch.

[SkalleN]

Ronaldo fss, can you just get it? Tatw is tatw and it isn't co atw no touch? It isnt he same move and to get your question answered again, no 10 tatws is NOT a longer combo then 11 htw. And dont replay "but tatw is atw co nt so it would be more then the htws" because it isn't just get it you stupid retard.

And no, it isn't strange.

Do you think patw is a combo aswell?

[L_I_S]

umm I think that the principle is the same because its atw-co nt, just that tatw is atw-co nt no ground touch, and atw-co (normal way) is with a ground touch.

Therefore:
1+1=2 and 1+1=20 [except it has a 0 at the end]
No, it doesn't work like that.
Do both and you will feel and tell the difference and recognize that they are not the same.

[Max]

this is one fucking useless discussion.

[Onas]

Sry, but I think Mr. Cristiano's got some point. Where is exactly the difference between TATW and (ATW-Crossover)nt? I think it should be called TATW, although the harder version also looks lame. Some people could've get example of it and we will have sh!tload  of names of tricks like K3EATW, Silas Verdan Crossover etc.  

[larsfreestyle]

yeah it just depends on who watches your vid some people see something and think : hey new trick you should give it a name!

and others will think : combo's combo's combo's

[Onas]

yeah it just depends on who watches your vid some people see something and think : hey new trick you should give it a name!

and others will think : combo's combo's combo's

And the others are usually smarter 
There is really lots of names we don't need and when someone lands a trick that really deserves a name, many poeple say that we already have too many tricks (e.g. Luki ATM)

[10RonaldoC]

yeah i think there are many useless tricks, like fxatw and so on
honestly, nobody else does them
to get back to my point, now i also think that the second part of tatw is not really crossover, because atw and crossover are ONE movement
but tatw and co-atw nt are not THAT different, tatw is just one movement
btw MANY people say tatw is atw-co (nt), look for tatw videos and many people comment "it´s atw-co (nt)"