We have disabled posting and registrations. Feel free to browse the historic Beyond Football content.
Quote from: Leha on Jul 26, 2009, 11:30: AMQuote from: BigMac on Jul 26, 2009, 11:26: AMleha you are so sad.you should find a new hobby, try freestyle.You say it 3rd time, go away from this topic with your noob comments plzI try, and often it gets better than your attempts :D (if I've translated correct last part of your phrase, if no then sorry)
Quote from: BigMac on Jul 26, 2009, 11:26: AMleha you are so sad.you should find a new hobby, try freestyle.You say it 3rd time, go away from this topic with your noob comments plzI try, and often it gets better than your attempts :D (if I've translated correct last part of your phrase, if no then sorry)
leha you are so sad.you should find a new hobby, try freestyle.
Quote from: SeBaS on Jul 26, 2009, 11:11: AMQuote from: Leha on Jul 26, 2009, 11:09: AMQuote from: SeBaS on Jul 26, 2009, 11:07: AMyep sorry leha but you couldnt prove anything, actually we were the ones that proved you wrong. wanna see the proof? look at the vid on the first page or at the pic. Answer to me - why all here said that Aasheim's kalatw was ground? Watch the vid, there is NO frame with the ball touching ground, so how you could now then?!dont you get it??? theres is not such a frame because the ball didnt touch the ground, hows a camera supposed to record something that didnt happen?So Aasheim has landed kalatw there? Ahahahahaha, if you think so, you are an idiot sryhttp://www.beyondfootball.com/forum/index.php/topic,6839.0.html'hows a camera supposed to record something that didnt happen' - each camera has its own quality if video which is counted as frames per second, more frames per sec - better quality, more you can see. See, there was filmed some phenomenons with 3,500 framed per sec camera and people could see smth new in those phenomenons, the same is here - if there was better quality we could see the frame with the ball touching the ground, but the quality is bad that's why there is no this frame. (camera is too slow to 'foto' that frame)
Quote from: Leha on Jul 26, 2009, 11:09: AMQuote from: SeBaS on Jul 26, 2009, 11:07: AMyep sorry leha but you couldnt prove anything, actually we were the ones that proved you wrong. wanna see the proof? look at the vid on the first page or at the pic. Answer to me - why all here said that Aasheim's kalatw was ground? Watch the vid, there is NO frame with the ball touching ground, so how you could now then?!dont you get it??? theres is not such a frame because the ball didnt touch the ground, hows a camera supposed to record something that didnt happen?
Quote from: SeBaS on Jul 26, 2009, 11:07: AMyep sorry leha but you couldnt prove anything, actually we were the ones that proved you wrong. wanna see the proof? look at the vid on the first page or at the pic. Answer to me - why all here said that Aasheim's kalatw was ground? Watch the vid, there is NO frame with the ball touching ground, so how you could now then?!
yep sorry leha but you couldnt prove anything, actually we were the ones that proved you wrong. wanna see the proof? look at the vid on the first page or at the pic.
You might delay, but time won't