yep sorry leha but you couldnt prove anything, actually we were the ones that proved you wrong. wanna see the proof? look at the vid on the first page or at the pic.
Answer to me - why all here said that Aasheim's kalatw was ground? Watch the vid, there is NO frame with the ball touching ground, so how you could now then?!
dont you get it??? theres is not such a frame because the ball didnt touch the ground, hows a camera supposed to record something that didnt happen?
So Aasheim has landed kalatw there? Ahahahahaha, if you think so, you are an idiot sry
http://www.beyondfootball.com/forum/index.php/topic,6839.0.html'hows a camera supposed to record something that didnt happen' - each camera has its own quality if video which is counted as frames per second, more frames per sec - better quality, more you can see. See, there was filmed some phenomenons with 3,500 framed per sec camera and people could see smth new in those phenomenons, the same is here - if there was better quality we could see the frame with the ball touching the ground, but the quality is bad that's why there is no this frame. (camera is too slow to 'foto' that frame)
