We have disabled posting and registrations. Feel free to browse the historic Beyond Football content.
landedhere leha :thumbsup:http://pictureupload.de/originals/pictures/250709142140_abcde.jpg
Quote from: Ivan on Jul 24, 2009, 11:22: PMlandedhere leha :thumbsup:http://pictureupload.de/originals/pictures/250709142140_abcde.jpgThis is frame after ball touched ground, camera quality is so bad that there isn't a frame with ball touching ground
Quote from: Leha on Jul 25, 2009, 04:33: AMQuote from: Ivan on Jul 24, 2009, 11:22: PMlandedhere leha :thumbsup:http://pictureupload.de/originals/pictures/250709142140_abcde.jpgThis is frame after ball touched ground, camera quality is so bad that there isn't a frame with ball touching groundThen how the hell did you come to the conclusion that it is ground in the first place?Also, how is anyone blind by saying it's landed if there's "no frame with ball touching ground"
No doubt about that. Landed. Leha, if you seriously means that is ground, then you need glasses, not everyone else here..
I've realized that it was ground not by watching that there wasn't frame with bal touching the ground, just because I have a brain and I could make a conclusion that it couldn't be done in that case (which I described in another topic)
You might delay, but time won't
Quote from: Leha on Jul 25, 2009, 05:52: AMI've realized that it was ground not by watching that there wasn't frame with bal touching the ground, just because I have a brain and I could make a conclusion that it couldn't be done in that case (which I described in another topic) Just because you made a conclusion doesn't mean it's correct (which it isn't). I don't see how you can think it's ground, your explanation is just wrong. And there's not even a point to discuss it, you obviously have made up your mind and refuse to change it. We won't change ours because we're right and you're not.