Dennis atw

[Sander]

m4x, he means it's the same trick except that eldo atw has the first rotation inside. he tries to tell us that it's the same difference as with fxatw and half hmatw-cross nt

[Max]

m4x, he means it's the same trick except that eldo atw has the first rotation inside. he tries to tell us that it's the same difference as with fxatw and half hmatw-cross nt

oh ok he means the reverse motion right?

[Sander]

m4x, he means it's the same trick except that eldo atw has the first rotation inside. he tries to tell us that it's the same difference as with fxatw and half hmatw-cross nt

oh ok he means the reverse motion right?

yes, the first leg the other way so it's 'reverse'

[ARS]

OMG, why most of freestylers,  who has writen here their posts, don`t know anything about freestyle?? :saywhat: :dontknow: :dontknow: It`s not a new trick, it`s just a combo hatw in-cross nt-htw nt!! There is only one difference between matw-htw nt and a combo on this video - his leg hit the ground after hatw in!! Why someone say smth about Reverse FX atw?? Reverse FW atw would be hhmatw-cross nt or hatw in-half htw nt-cross nt... So, ppl, don`t write, please, if you aren`t sure that you are right...

[Philip WG]

OMG, why most of freestylers,  who has writen here their posts, don`t know anything about freestyle?? :saywhat: :dontknow: :dontknow: It`s not a new trick, it`s just a combo hatw in-cross nt-htw nt!! There is only one difference between matw-htw nt and a combo on this video - his leg hit the ground after hatw in!! Why someone say smth about Reverse FX atw?? Reverse FW atw would be hhmatw-cross nt or hatw in-half htw nt-cross nt... So, ppl, don`t write, please, if you aren`t sure that you are right...

I believe you are right on this one. It's an old school move, very old. TomK used to do this, but outside. I dunno what you tried to do, but imo it looks like in atw - cross - htw nt , (cpmatw2 in my words) . ARS is probably right, it doesn't look much like fx or skala or any other atws, it's more of a combo. And even without the htw, it's probably a combo, because it's executed in a non-fluent move. Or am i totally wrong ?

 :pimp:

[oLi]

OMG, why most of freestylers,  who has writen here their posts, don`t know anything about freestyle?? :saywhat: :dontknow: :dontknow: It`s not a new trick, it`s just a combo hatw in-cross nt-htw nt!! There is only one difference between matw-htw nt and a combo on this video - his leg hit the ground after hatw in!! Why someone say smth about Reverse FX atw?? Reverse FW atw would be hhmatw-cross nt or hatw in-half htw nt-cross nt... So, ppl, don`t write, please, if you aren`t sure that you are right...

I believe you are right on this one. It's an old school move, very old. TomK used to do this, but outside. I dunno what you tried to do, but imo it looks like in atw - cross - htw nt , (cpmatw2 in my words) . ARS is probably right, it doesn't look much like fx or skala or any other atws, it's more of a combo. And even without the htw, it's probably a combo, because it's executed in a non-fluent move. Or am i totally wrong ?

 :pimp:

I will have to agree with your words there. Wisely written.

[Zealot1992]

i agree with nen