nt Combos

[Fee]

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?

and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.

[Leha]

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?

and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.

patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...

[SvenF]

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?

and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.

patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...

If it isn't style, what is it then? I agree with Fee.

and about this:

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion

it will take more time for him... it's his decision

More time to do what? I would rather take more time to get consistant at easier tricks, to get a better style when trying to do more difficult tricks. Of course, if he skips cross-matw(nt) and immediately goes to matw-matw(nt), it will take less time for him to get this combo, but what's the point of it if he has no good style on it. I agree that he can do whatever he wants, but isn't it our job to give him advices that he will take advantage most? Otherwise he wouldn't have asked us to tell him.

[imagestyles]

Here's my newest video:

feature=channel_page
Tell me if my style is bad or not...

[Leha]

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?

and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.

patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...

If it isn't style, what is it then? I agree with Fee.

and about this:

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion

it will take more time for him... it's his decision

More time to do what? I would rather take more time to get consistant at easier tricks, to get a better style when trying to do more difficult tricks. Of course, if he skips cross-matw(nt) and immediately goes to matw-matw(nt), it will take less time for him to get this combo, but what's the point of it if he has no good style on it. I agree that he can do whatever he wants, but isn't it our job to give him advices that he will take advantage most? Otherwise he wouldn't have asked us to tell him.

it means that you have to practice patw more, because you haven't got 'extra time' after it...
more time to do cross-matw nt and then matw-matw nt. Maybe he will have pretty nice style without cross-matw nt, don't be so consider

[Fee]

maybe, but maybe not.


just do what ever you want, but my advice is to start with the easiert one.
or do you start with amatw-amatw nt before you can do cross-amatwnt?

i don´t think so  :thumbsup:

i´m out of that discussion

[SvenF]

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?

and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.

patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...

If it isn't style, what is it then? I agree with Fee.

and about this:

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion

it will take more time for him... it's his decision

More time to do what? I would rather take more time to get consistant at easier tricks, to get a better style when trying to do more difficult tricks. Of course, if he skips cross-matw(nt) and immediately goes to matw-matw(nt), it will take less time for him to get this combo, but what's the point of it if he has no good style on it. I agree that he can do whatever he wants, but isn't it our job to give him advices that he will take advantage most? Otherwise he wouldn't have asked us to tell him.

it means that you have to practice patw more, because you haven't got 'extra time' after it...
more time to do cross-matw nt and then matw-matw nt. Maybe he will have pretty nice style without cross-matw nt, don't be so consider

I can guarantee you that almost everyone who does matw-matw(nt) before cross-matw(nt) has a bad style on matw-matw(nt), it would look sloppy..

[SvenF]

maybe, but maybe not.


just do what ever you want, but my advice is to start with the easiert one.
or do you start with amatw-amatw nt before you can do cross-amatwnt?

i don´t think so  :thumbsup:

i´m out of that discussion

A lot of people do this, but you can see the result.
But just let it be as it is, everyone has his opinion. :thumbsup:

[Leha]

maybe, but maybe not.


just do what ever you want, but my advice is to start with the easiert one.
or do you start with amatw-amatw nt before you can do cross-amatwnt?

i don´t think so  :thumbsup:

i´m out of that discussion

yeah, I have done amatw-amatw nt before cross-amatw nt

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?

and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.

patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...

If it isn't style, what is it then? I agree with Fee.

and about this:

I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think

Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).

if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it

he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion

it will take more time for him... it's his decision

More time to do what? I would rather take more time to get consistant at easier tricks, to get a better style when trying to do more difficult tricks. Of course, if he skips cross-matw(nt) and immediately goes to matw-matw(nt), it will take less time for him to get this combo, but what's the point of it if he has no good style on it. I agree that he can do whatever he wants, but isn't it our job to give him advices that he will take advantage most? Otherwise he wouldn't have asked us to tell him.

it means that you have to practice patw more, because you haven't got 'extra time' after it...
more time to do cross-matw nt and then matw-matw nt. Maybe he will have pretty nice style without cross-matw nt, don't be so consider

I can guarantee you that almost everyone who does matw-matw(nt) before cross-matw(nt) has a bad style on matw-matw(nt), it would look sloppy..

I have done matw-matw nt before cross matw nt, and it looked pretty nice

[Mikael]

Start with getting your lip pierced. ;)

P.S. You can do tatw-atw ot tatw-atw nt? You didn't specify, lol. Anyway, you have to jump higher when doing matw nt after something - practice your kamatws first.

[Christiaan]

Here's my newest video:

feature=channel_page
Tell me if my style is bad or not...

style is really good! :thumbsup:

[Magnus]

Yeah I agree with Sven, Fee and Chris. Start with co-matw(nt) first. When you've mastered that, and you can do it with good style, then I suggest that you start with co-amatw(nt) and co-atatw(nt). But as the other have mentioned: These nt combos involve a left foot trick, either co or amatw/atatw. But remember, practise these combos before trying matw-matw(nt) or tatw-amatw(nt) or whatever. I remember I used to struggle ALOT with tatw-matw (nt). It was very sloppy. And then I practised only co-matw (nt) for a week and it looked much better after that :thumbsup:

Btw: Your style is really good man! Looking forward to your next video:)