you sound like a broken record. if you wanna live under a rock and not open ur eyes to the rest of the intelligent world, then keep that way.
my question wasn't answered
as for you second part your truly pathetic
you can very nearly see atoms though using the newest techology or see close enough to see they exist.
here are palladium atoms in a crystal lattice
an atom isn't visible
PERIOD
stop fucking preaching
stop fucking preaching your science
Tito; you don't apply science on the Quran, you apply contens of the Quran on science that already has been theorized. Without the science we've achieved those extracts wouldn't have been interpretated in that way. The only way the Quran would be ahead of science is if you actually read the Quran and from there made the conclusion that there are atoms and then proved it (before science did so).
The thing with those extracts is that they are heavily interpretated in a way they sound related to science, eventhough I sincerely doubt that were their initial meaning. Unless you show me some undiscovered thing (like the atom) interpretated from the Quran and from that you prove the statement from the Quran scientificly correct, there isn't really anything scientifical about the Quran.
The atom, how do we know it's for real?
We don't, not for sure. Experiments strongly indicates the existance of an atom, but we can never be 100 % sure there's an actual atom there. But that doesn't matter. We just use the atom as an model so things will be easier answered, just as we use gravity to explain why things fall and the movement of the planets.
Evolution isn't something you choose to "believe" in; it's fact. Take maths as an example: let's say you were given the equation 3+x=4. Using some easy logic, you come to the conclusion that x = 1, and that's an definite answer and is not something you choose to believe in.
If you study the Qur'an you will see that the Qur'an does not contradict any established modern scientific fact. This is a true statement. Many have tried to find scientific errors in the Qur'an, but they have failed.
This is what modern science has to say on the topic of zoology, in particular bees. Modern day science tells us that the male bee has only one purpose, and that is to reproduce with the female - there's really no other purpose for a male bee. Now here's the important point - however, the worker bee or the soldier bee is a female bee. She is the one that builds the nest, leaves her home, and goes out in search of food. This what modern science tells us - that we have discovered only recently. Now it takes a specialist in the field to detect the sex of the bee - you cannot look at it from the naked eye - it is impossible, there is no way you can look at it that way. Now let me show you what the Qur'an says about bees. Now, keep one thing in mind here. In the Arabic language, animals are either male or female. Like in English we have the word cow - "the cow in the pasture" - that does not tell us if the cow is male or female. But in Arabic animals are either male or female. There is no gender neutral term for animals. Let's look inside chapter sixteen verse sixty-eight. It says over there:
"and thy Lord taught the bee" (here it is specified a female bee) "to build its cells in hills, on trees, and in men's habitations, then to eat of all the produce and find with skill the spacious paths of its Lord."This is exactly what modern science today tell us - that the bee that goes out and builds the nest, that goes out looking for food, as what the Qur'an has mentioned, is indeed the female bee.
IF Statement in the Quran = Scientific fact THEN
(it can be one or more of the following 8 possibilities)
A. Perhaps the author of the statement was a genius.
B. A very good guess, luck.
C. Perhaps the author of the statement was a great scientist
D. Coincidence (ex: a poetic statement which just happened to match
up with science),, and the author had no intention of talking
about science; it was an accident. Coincidence is a form of luck.
E. Common sense (ex: rain causes grass to grow).
F. The scientific fact is observable.
G. The information already pre-existed in history.
(this can only be entertained if we have historical errors)
H. A source greater than man was involved.
So anyway, I'll have to raise a question now. How did the author of the Qur'an know this scientific statement, that the bee that leaves the nest in search of food is the female bee? Let's look at the above quote. Perhaps the author of the Qur'an was a genius or a scientist, which is (A) and (C). Well, I don't think that could be a possibility, because no matter how smart you are, you'll never be able to detect the sex of a bee, unless you had these modern scientific methods which did not exist one thousand four hundred years ago, so those could not be a possibility. Let's look at (F). Perhaps the scientific fact is observable. Well, this is not true either, because you cannot look at the bees and tell which one is a male or female. Let's look at (B). Perhaps it was a very good guess. Well, it is a possibility. If it was a good guess then we'll say it was a fifty-fifty chance, one half chance if that was the case - or coincidence, we can look at it that way. Now let's look at (G) . The information already pre-existed in history, therefore the author of the Qur'an simply plagiarized from another source. That long ago its not possible. So the only solution is (H).
And thats only one small example
Tito; you don't apply science on the Quran, you apply contens of the Quran on science that already has been theorized. Without the science we've achieved those extracts wouldn't have been interpretated in that way. The only way the Quran would be ahead of science is if you actually read the Quran and from there made the conclusion that there are atoms and then proved it (before science did so)
the meaning of them haven't changed
and how could those things even be in something thats over 1400 years old when science recently discovered those.
