Beyond Football Freestyle Tricktionary

[Sander]

Yes but aatw is half out htw-atw?

well it's hard to say if something is half htw(out) or rev. cross. aatw is one of these + atw nt. but actually you are right about that this trick should get a name just like aatw. but also cross - atw nt should get a name then ;) a lot of new names should be invented then

[Cogliono Grande]

Cross-atw is different from the trick skóra did. On cross-atw u put ur foot to the ground and then do atw. What Skóra did was a kinda like half htw-atw nt. ;)

[Sander]

i know what you mean bolla, but it's the same amount of touches and the same amount of rotations

[Cogliono Grande]

Wonder how many new tricks that will come when Skóra Air Combos 3 come out .
Do we have a name for atw-satw nt?

[Sander]

Wonder how many new tricks that will come when Skóra Air Combos 3 come out .
Do we have a name for atw-satw nt?

that is not possible. just like atw-amatw nt is not possible

[Cogliono Grande]

Wonder how many new tricks that will come when Skóra Air Combos 3 come out .
Do we have a name for atw-satw nt?

that is not possible. just like atw-amatw nt is not possible
[/quoteWhy not? :dontknow: Skóra did, atw-satw nt, or was it hatw-satw nt? At least it is a htatw-matw nt and do we have a name for it?

[TPAKTOPUCT]

Skala atw-cross nt  - Skala matw

[Sander]

bolla i think you mean what tpaktopuct wrote. it's the same as hatw-satw nt indeed. but try this: if you have atw-cross you can do it 2 ways: normal or nt. atw-amatw will always be the same. putting nt behind it doesn't make since since the minimum limit of touches is already there (so you can't skip a touch that will make it nt)

[Cogliono Grande]

bolla i think you mean what tpaktopuct wrote. it's the same as hatw-satw nt indeed. but try this: if you have atw-cross you can do it 2 ways: normal or nt. atw-amatw will always be the same. putting nt behind it doesn't make since since the minimum limit of touches is already there (so you can't skip a touch that will make it nt)

I understand ur point. I thought that the first touch after the hatw, desided if there was gonna be hatw or atw. So Hatw-Alatw ain't atw-alatw nt since u take the ball with the other foot (what i thought before). Thanks for clearing it up for me.

[Sander]

bolla i think you mean what tpaktopuct wrote. it's the same as hatw-satw nt indeed. but try this: if you have atw-cross you can do it 2 ways: normal or nt. atw-amatw will always be the same. putting nt behind it doesn't make since since the minimum limit of touches is already there (so you can't skip a touch that will make it nt)

I understand ur point. I thought that the first touch after the hatw, desided if there was gonna be hatw or atw. So Hatw-Alatw ain't atw-alatw nt since u take the ball with the other foot (what i thought before). Thanks for clearing it up for me.

i'm glad you understood man  :cheers: you're welcome

[Siwy]

Hey I want to ask.Is the move such as "backheel bounce"? 

[Cogliono Grande]

Hey I want to ask.Is the move such as "backheel bounce"? 

You mean something like heel pancake? If so i think it's just called heel pancake.