It's time to settle this once and for all

[Golomejic]

tatw-amatw; "-" means, or represents touch, meaning it's a touch combo.

tatw amatw; see this time it has no "-", meaning there is no touch.

eg;

atw-atw-htw-tatw amatw-htw -> right way

atw-atw-htw-tatw-amatw nt-htw -> wrong way


ok, thats all carry on now

[Mr. T]

Good idea, although it might be a little hard for people with dyslexia to see the difference. :dontknow: And for people who isn't clear about the "-"-thing, might think it still means with touch even if it's written without, or if someone forgets to write a "-" between tatw tatw for instance, they would think it's a no touch if they're clear about the rule ... It may cause confusion. I think "tatw nt amatw" works better, to be honest ...

[emogirl]

Bad idea.

[Golomejic]

Good idea

It's not an idea. It's how we used to write them untill people found a missing "-" too confusing, I guess. God bless them.

It would be hard for dislexic people to read it? And I guess they find shit like amatw, tatw, rhjatw, atw easy to read so we don't wanna fuck them over by removing "-"  every once in a while. Besides, there isn't much difference.

What if someone forgets a "t" in "tatw"? Should we find a whole nother way of writting tricks down?

Bad idea.

I'm sorry, emos opinions aren't taken into consideration.

[FSjordan]

should just put a "nt" between tatw and amatw

[Philip WG]

Yeah i like this. There is often confusion whether it's nt or not. It has to be some system to avoid this confusion.

OT : How did Croatia in the Eurovision yesterday ? I didn't watch  :biggrin:

 :pimp:

[oLi]

I don't like the idea but while you're at suggestions of this kind I say this; skip the atw in amatw and such so eg
Tatw amatw nt becomes
t - am nt

[Mike]

tatw-amatw; "-" means, or represents touch, meaning it's a touch combo.

tatw amatw; see this time it has no "-", meaning there is no touch.

eg;

atw-atw-htw-tatw amatw-htw -> right way

atw-atw-htw-tatw-amatw nt-htw -> wrong way


ok, thats all carry on now

Greatness has struck Beyond Football.

as "-" means a touch, it's increadibly easy just taking the "-" away when it's a (nt) trick. This was how it was used in the before, but noobs and people without the slightest brain poluted it.

There will be no skipping :cursing:

[Philip WG]

On the net, this will be the easiest way. IRL i think you have to mark that the combo is nt. Or just simply say [ Tattv amatevv ] instead of [TeeAaTeeVee AaEmAaTeeVee] ( In swedish )

 :pimp:

[Fee]

i think it´s a pretty good idea, not really hard to remember.

i think it´s not that hard to get the fs community used to it. post it in the polish fs forums and abou 2/3 of all fs´er will know what is meant with the "-" or without the "-"  :thumbsup:

[Golomejic]

I don't like the idea but while you're at suggestions of this kind I say this; skip the atw in amatw and such so eg
Tatw amatw nt becomes
t - am nt

You actually think this way "atw-atw-t-am nt-htw" would be easier/more logical/better than "atw-atw-tatw amatw-htw"? :saywhat:


How would you write taatw amatw then?

[Mr. T]

Good idea

It's not an idea. It's how we used to write them untill people found a missing "-" too confusing, I guess. God bless them.

Why bring it back if it didn't work so well before? I know it's easier and all, but it's not much harder to just put a "nt" inbetween either, to avoid confusions. Although if everyone get to know this rule it could work out great ...

You could make a poll, to see which people would prefer; "tatw amatw", "tatw nt amatw" or other variants?