Creative freestylers shouldn't even be considered as top athletes in freestyle. So you can think alternatively, why should that put you ahead of freestylers that bust their asses off in training sessions.
I think we only need 3 of each group and 3 under all-round. I seriously can't be stuffed listing 20 freestylers.
Uppers: Turlakov, Luki, Bengau
Sits: Linder, Abdellah, Baruzdin. To be honest, I rarely watch sit videos. My opinion here can be disreguarded.
Lower: Skora, MP, Mirko.
All-round: Azun, Szymo. I can't think of any others
Very sad man,, i respect your point of view,, i dont know what for you is "creative",
because thanks to the "creative" this art-sport exists, to touzani, who "create" his innovation tatw.. to palle who create the nt, patw,
to abdullah, that has the creativity to create tricks in sit down position,, to abbas who create a lot of new tricks, that in these days are essencials
for all the freestylers, and for all all the freestylers who colaborated with his part in this beautiful sport. In few words, this sport, exists thanks to the creativity, but wait.......creative...creative,, how can i explain this word? mmmm... well here i go...if yo do the moves,tricks of people did, that were creatives for the first time, then, you aren`t creative. You can be creative when you do something new, fresh and original. Then, i think when you see a "creative freestyler" in this moment you compare with hardcore lower combos, and you will say: "well its cool, but nothing compared with the long combos nt."thats only my theory that probably you think. Now THINK in this,, i can say that:... for me is more diffcult, to create new tricks and a great variety of moves, and to create one style that nothing has done,,, than only,, you keep,. practicing the same moves all the time,, the same nts, the same combos, only in different order, and only with one goal,, that you can progress to do more long combos, and incorpore the most diffcult tricks in the earth that you saw in the youtube`s video "Top ten most diffcult freestyle tricks part 3" (patw,eldoatw,pmatw, skmtaw)and then you willbe the best freestyler in the world or one of the best.....for me noooooooooooooT,,
This sarcasm was only to explain that you can`t say,, that creative(in your point of view, because i explained what is creative for me),, is not hard,, or are not considered top athlets in the freestyle.
This sport its not called, " Lower Freestyle football"?, "Sits freestyle football"?, "uppers freestyle football"?,
Its Called only FREEstyle football,, FREE-FREE-FREE-FREE-FREE-FREE!!!!!!!!!!!!,
Its stupid compare,, what trick or style is more diffult, because each trick, combo or style,,, has his own and proper difficulty,
And each person choose his way of freestyle football,, if your way, is the lower combos, , because you find it more difficult, good luck
enjoy your freestyle,all the people will apreciatte your freestyle, no doubt, But believe me,, when a guy juggle the ball with the dick, will be too hardcore, because, you need to much training,, to much psicology(thinks in the hottest girl in the world), when a guy juggle 10 balls with one foot will be hardcore, and in the actuality,, There are freestylers who make creative combos without any atw(why not call it: hardcore creative combos?), , and then, you need to acept, the freestyle ways that the people choose,, and acept that other styles need very much training like the lower combos, only in different ways.
And one thing more, the creative, is not a category, for me there aren`t categories in the freestyle, all the people can be creative,,all the people can create new things, but in the freestyle there are only different styles,, only that the freestyle that the most of the people practice is: lower(atw,nt),, upper and sits. And when you see something different of the classic, probably will be creative,, but its better call it "a different style".
And please respect the other ways of freestyle, all the ways of freestyle has his own difficulty, and all are amazing.
This is my point of view,, sorry for the bad english
