szmatw amatw amatw nt !
szmatw- amatw amatw nt*
actually what adrian wrote was correct...he didnt write szmatw amatw nt amatw nt he wrote that the only bit that was nt was the amatw amatw, which of course is right.
skora nt is written as tatw amatw amatw matw amatw nt.. and the frst part tatw amatw are done in nt. i think both are right but szmatw amatw amatw nt would make most people think of it s szmatw amatw nt amatw nt... correct me if i am wrong.
yes i will correct you because you are wrong (Y) please just accept you are incorrect, you tried to sound clever but in fact what adrian wrote is entirely right. no skora nt is not written as tatw amatw amatw matw amatw nt it is written as tatw amatw nt amatw nt matw nt amatw nt. some people write it the way you said because it is long and a pain to write out, but in this case adrian would have just written szmatw amatw nt amatw nt if he thought it was that.
That's the noob way, bro. It's typed like that so that noobs can clearly understand how the combo is done. After you understand how combos work, "nt" becomes useless. Dashes(-) mean touches and leaving out the dashes means it's no touch..making the "NT" part in notation redundant.
Peace!
Or may be it's just the most correct way to do it?
I can't really understand. You guys criticizes Xixo because he wrote something like T AT nt (meaning TATW ATATW nt, an abbreviation), and then you guys fall into almost the same trap.
Although it's redundant, it's the most correct way of notating the combo, and if anyone do it otherwise, it will confuse a lot of people.
(no offense to anyone through this, I know you guys are all great freestylers with good intentions, just that sometimes we should kinda take a step back and observe what we did, just for a greater understanding.)