How many freestyle tricks are there?

[Cogliono Grande]

I don't think any one will start to say atw-co nt-htw-co nt for tatw-amatw nt. Nevertheless my intent was to figure out what the majority define a trick as, in order for us to be able to count the tricks. If you think that matw should be called an own trick and not atw-co nt, then there are many tricks. If you think that amatw is entitled to be called an own trick there are even more.

[crazyhindufser]

theres AT LEAST 4..

I wouldn't go as far to say that...

  Five at the MOST

[Patrick Edwards]

Well what do you guys define as an own trick? Do you perceive amatw like a combo, or an own trick?

tbh I like the trick names we have now,

matw is easier than saying (i)atw-co(nt) the "i" - means inside because i think thats how we'd have to distinguish if its by todays standards a tatw or a matw

or say you wanted to tell someone you did beck-amatw (nt)
you'd have to say i did hhjatw-(i)atw-co-htw-co (nt) ------- i think *im not good at naming lower combos*

If ANYTHING I say lets stick to the trick names we have now, and stop making new ones unless their truly new

matw isnt  insideatw-co nt, they look differant

....yes it is....

nope, atw-co (nt) has a step in between where you put your foot down before you begin the co whereas matw is a smooth motion

[Lucaso]

Since we are not able to realize what is "trick" and come over with different names we are not able to count it down. Not even if someone (xixo) sucrifice himself and suck Satan's dick.

[Tupac]

Well what do you guys define as an own trick? Do you perceive amatw like a combo, or an own trick?

tbh I like the trick names we have now,

matw is easier than saying (i)atw-co(nt) the "i" - means inside because i think thats how we'd have to distinguish if its by todays standards a tatw or a matw

or say you wanted to tell someone you did beck-amatw (nt)
you'd have to say i did hhjatw-(i)atw-co-htw-co (nt) ------- i think *im not good at naming lower combos*

If ANYTHING I say lets stick to the trick names we have now, and stop making new ones unless their truly new

matw isnt  insideatw-co nt, they look differant

....yes it is....

nope, atw-co (nt) has a step in between where you put your foot down before you begin the co whereas matw is a smooth motion

it depends on how you look at it

[NZ ABDULLAH]

there's only atw
and the rest are just combos
uppers are not as important as lowers
and sits are too easy
s3 style is not freestyle
 

thats silly
crossover hoptheworld xover arent around the world
so i spose there are 4
eclipse isnt around the world
uppers are just as important as lowers sits are 2 it depends on the person
say uppers arent important to turlakov or bengau
if uppers arent important sam (usa) is insignifcant but he isnt haha
if sits are so easy how come theres your not matte linder there as hard as you make them
s3 is freestyle basket and football, they just do tricks which are entertaining and they find fun to do(thats what the sports all about) theyre trying to make a living so dont criticize themfreestyle is different to everyone ; its free

Defo agree with u there Damian !!!

[SkalleN]

haha this topic is hilarious, we will never be able to count all tricks. And stop being retarded, amatw IS NOT htw co NT amatw is amatw and no others. Patw s patw and not 3 atws nt, tatw is tatw and so on. Stop arguing about it.

[tbc]

this topic can go on and on till one day the people on the west of Atlantic run out of gas
and the ones on the east run out of petrol

[Patrick Edwards]

Well what do you guys define as an own trick? Do you perceive amatw like a combo, or an own trick?

tbh I like the trick names we have now,

matw is easier than saying (i)atw-co(nt) the "i" - means inside because i think thats how we'd have to distinguish if its by todays standards a tatw or a matw

or say you wanted to tell someone you did beck-amatw (nt)
you'd have to say i did hhjatw-(i)atw-co-htw-co (nt) ------- i think *im not good at naming lower combos*

If ANYTHING I say lets stick to the trick names we have now, and stop making new ones unless their truly new

matw isnt  insideatw-co nt, they look differant

....yes it is....

nope, atw-co (nt) has a step in between where you put your foot down before you begin the co whereas matw is a smooth motion

it depends on how you look at it

no it doen't, wether youb look at from left, right of even head-on it will always be hw-co (nt) andnot amatw

[Tupac]

Well what do you guys define as an own trick? Do you perceive amatw like a combo, or an own trick?

tbh I like the trick names we have now,

matw is easier than saying (i)atw-co(nt) the "i" - means inside because i think thats how we'd have to distinguish if its by todays standards a tatw or a matw

or say you wanted to tell someone you did beck-amatw (nt)
you'd have to say i did hhjatw-(i)atw-co-htw-co (nt) ------- i think *im not good at naming lower combos*

If ANYTHING I say lets stick to the trick names we have now, and stop making new ones unless their truly new

matw isnt  insideatw-co nt, they look differant

....yes it is....

nope, atw-co (nt) has a step in between where you put your foot down before you begin the co whereas matw is a smooth motion

it depends on how you look at it

no it doen't, wether youb look at from left, right of even head-on it will always be hw-co (nt) andnot amatw

i dont know what a "HW" is...

[Retty]

Well what do you guys define as an own trick? Do you perceive amatw like a combo, or an own trick?

tbh I like the trick names we have now,

matw is easier than saying (i)atw-co(nt) the "i" - means inside because i think thats how we'd have to distinguish if its by todays standards a tatw or a matw

or say you wanted to tell someone you did beck-amatw (nt)
you'd have to say i did hhjatw-(i)atw-co-htw-co (nt) ------- i think *im not good at naming lower combos*

If ANYTHING I say lets stick to the trick names we have now, and stop making new ones unless their truly new

matw isnt  insideatw-co nt, they look differant

....yes it is....

nope, atw-co (nt) has a step in between where you put your foot down before you begin the co whereas matw is a smooth motion

it depends on how you look at it

no it doen't, wether youb look at from left, right of even head-on it will always be hw-co (nt) andnot amatw

i dont know what a "HW" is...

wtf do you think it is if he's talking about amatw? why didn't you say that you don't know what "doen't" "wether" or "youb" is?

 

[Tupac]

Well what do you guys define as an own trick? Do you perceive amatw like a combo, or an own trick?

tbh I like the trick names we have now,

matw is easier than saying (i)atw-co(nt) the "i" - means inside because i think thats how we'd have to distinguish if its by todays standards a tatw or a matw

or say you wanted to tell someone you did beck-amatw (nt)
you'd have to say i did hhjatw-(i)atw-co-htw-co (nt) ------- i think *im not good at naming lower combos*

If ANYTHING I say lets stick to the trick names we have now, and stop making new ones unless their truly new

matw isnt  insideatw-co nt, they look differant

....yes it is....

nope, atw-co (nt) has a step in between where you put your foot down before you begin the co whereas matw is a smooth motion

it depends on how you look at it

no it doen't, wether youb look at from left, right of even head-on it will always be hw-co (nt) andnot amatw

i dont know what a "HW" is...

wtf do you think it is if he's talking about amatw? why didn't you say that you don't know what "doen't" "wether" or "youb" is?

 

i didnt understand any of your post, "wether" "doen't" and "youb" arent words either