Fabian's overall level was much harder than Gunther's overall level. I didn't divide between uppers, sits, and lowers. It was just an observation that Gunther's lowers were better than Fabian, and that was the only thing he was better than Fabian at. You also get negative points for not being well rounded in most competitions like this, so being well rounded does matter. Fabian is obviously more well rounded. Execution has to be judged as well. Gunther's execution in lowers was good, but his uppers and sits were kind of poor. Fabian had pretty good execution in everything, so he wins there too.
The only explanation is a blatant bias in favor of lowers or Gunther's bigger name. Gunther is a very good freestyler, but he should have lost here.
Onas, it's ok for a fan like you to have a bias like this, because you opinion doesn't effect the outcome of the competition. It's not ok for the judges to be biased like this. Their decisions need to be fair to create an even playing field.
If there is just a call for lowers to be considered more important, you guys need to create a new sport where only lowers are allowed. Until then, you must judge all aspects evenly.