Well what do you guys define as an own trick? Do you perceive amatw like a combo, or an own trick?
tbh I like the trick names we have now,
matw is easier than saying (i)atw-co(nt) the "i" - means inside because i think thats how we'd have to distinguish if its by todays standards a tatw or a matw
or say you wanted to tell someone you did beck-amatw (nt)
you'd have to say i did hhjatw-(i)atw-co-htw-co (nt) ------- i think *im not good at naming lower combos*
If ANYTHING I say lets stick to the trick names we have now, and stop making new ones unless their truly new
matw isnt insideatw-co nt, they look differant
....yes it is....
nope, atw-co (nt) has a step in between where you put your foot down before you begin the co whereas matw is a smooth motion
it depends on how you look at it
no it doen't, wether youb look at from left, right of even head-on it will always be hw-co (nt) andnot amatw
i dont know what a "HW" is...
wtf do you think it is if he's talking about amatw? why didn't you say that you don't know what "doen't" "wether" or "youb" is?
i didnt understand any of your post, "wether" "doen't" and "youb" arent words either
Because that's what Patrick wrote in the same post where you didn't understand what "hw" was when he was talking about amatw. So I was stating previously that you were basically being awkward and trying to act smart when you're clearly not. Which is why I pointed out his other typos in the post and was asking you, why you didn't refer to those typos when you knew exactly that he meant "htw" and not "hw". Dude, you can't fucking read, look at Patrick's post onwards and you'll see. 
well if you dont know i dont train lowers, so i thought maybe "hw" was an actual trick, i didnt even know he was refering to an amatw, and if he was hes an idiot because i was refering to a MATW not AMATW, i dont know where amatw came into play
