Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum
General Category => General Chat => Topic started by: manutd. on Dec 20, 2007, 10:55: AM
-
The place you can ask the smarter members on here for help with homework.
OTC,
What part of the plant sprouts roots?
-
I hate the hell out of plants.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_roots
You'll do better there
:lol:
-
I'm already there, but thanks. :thumbsup:
-
Good idea
Although if I will need help I'll prolly make a seperat topic just to put more focus on the subject :o
-
thank god for wikipedia :angel: helped me a lot during college with I.T.
-
I had a teacher that didn't allow us to use Wikipedia because it wasn't "reliable enough." :bs:
-
Same, my teacher said that people edit it, and it may be wrong information.
-
Our Religion teacher also said that. Its pathetic. The data on Wikipedia is from real sources ffs. And u cant write shit there, people check it all the time. They have 100000 mods for that.
-
Just double-check it if the assignment matters. Plus, if your teacher allows you to use electronic sources, you can just "use" the linked source.
On some of the more "esoteric" topics you get shit that people don't go over too well. You don't get the traffic that the more popular topics do. The mods tear the hell out of everything else.
-
The place you can ask the smarter members on here for help with homework.
OTC,
What part of the plant sprouts roots?
okay can anyone beside Moby tell the answer to 1+1 :lol:
-
i never have had a teacher allow wikipedia as a real site
-
The place you can ask the smarter members on here for help with homework.
OTC,
What part of the plant sprouts roots?
okay can anyone beside Moby tell the answer to 1+1 :lol:
idiot, it's obviously 11.
-
wikipedia is good but prfessional people say to used it but not write it in your bibliography. the reason is anybody can write anything
-
you guys really shouldnt worry about wikipedia not being reliable i mean, i am a member there...
-
but there isnt any other big free encyclopedia or someone any??
-
you guys really shouldnt worry about wikipedia not being reliable i mean, i am a member there...
And that makes it so much more reliable? :'(
K guys, this thread is for homework!
Tito, I trust you'll keep this thread in order, since you're amazing at it. :)
-
i am building a robot, i need a good base, i was thinking of buying a cheap remote controll car- stripping it and then using that base...people agree or any other ideas?
-
The place you can ask the smarter members on here for help with homework.
OTC,
What part of the plant sprouts roots?
okay can anyone beside Moby tell the answer to 1+1 :lol:
idiot, it's obviously 11.
i didn't put an equals sign
-
I had a teacher that didn't allow us to use Wikipedia because it wasn't "reliable enough." :bs:
LOL yeah same at my school
and great topic borg, i like (we need some more smileys)
-
The place you can ask the smarter members on here for help with homework.
OTC,
What part of the plant sprouts roots?
okay can anyone beside Moby tell the answer to 1+1 :lol:
idiot, it's obviously 11.
i didn't put an equals sign
i know the answer
-
The place you can ask the smarter members on here for help with homework.
OTC,
What part of the plant sprouts roots?
okay can anyone beside Moby tell the answer to 1+1 :lol:
idiot, it's obviously 11.
i didn't put an equals sign
i know the answer
sure you do Moby sure you do
-
its like window right
-
god help you
that answer is 2 is that hard oh i forgot it's you i'm talking to
so good guess
-
i thought you said theres no equal
-
yes i asked for the answer how are you going to draw a Window with 1+1 you need the equal tomake the lines on the top and the bottom
btw i have to keep the order in this thread (as requested by Borg)
STAY ON TOPIC
STRICTLY HOMEWORK
-
so if you're saying we should "tell the answer to 1+1" and there is no equal sign given, then obviously there IS NO answer. all that can be done is 1+1 is simplified down to 2, but without a proper question there's no actual answer, just the number two. but then again we also have to take into account the grammatical error of "tell the answer to 1+1" which may or may not be intentional. if it is an intentional grammatical mistake, the problem becomes more complex where as if it's not, then we come back to the "no answer" answer with just the simplification of the term 1+1. supposing the grammatical error was intentional, if we "tell the answer to 1+1" it's as if we're treating the term "1+1" or "2" as a noun. in that case comes into the equation an "invisible problem" which we need to solve, derive an "answer" for, to be able to tell the answer to the term "2". in this case, since the statement was a response to "What part of the plant sprouts roots?", we can figure out the answer to that question first through some research first and foremost. as for telling the answer to "2", or "1+1", a number of interpretations can be derived. you could be telling the answer to two different people, the second poster of this thread, or just this page in general as the topic right now is on its second page, and so on and so forth. but Borg was the one asking the question, and the one who needed the answer. so is there a connection between Borg and the number "2" or the term "1+1"? well Borg has a karma of "2", his full name jeremy borg, including the space, has a total of 11 characters which can be attributed to a duller, more literal rather than mathematical translation of "one and one", AND going further with the "one and one" translation of the term, Borg will graduate from notre dame catholic secondary school in the year of 2011. two thousand and 11.
so can only logically conclude that either there is no actual answer but a simplified form of the term "1+1", or we misconstrued what you were trying to say and was actually looking to see if anybody had an answer for borg.
-
anyone could have written that i just takes an idiot to waste his time to write it
btw Stay on topic boys
-
anyone could have written that i just takes an idiot to waste his time to write it
btw Stay on topic boys
well ur right about the wasting time part. just don't go around suggesting ppl are idiots. ppl get bored ffs
-
believe me i know Moby his a nut case
-
so if you're saying we should "tell the answer to 1+1" and there is no equal sign given, then obviously there IS NO answer. all that can be done is 1+1 is simplified down to 2, but without a proper question there's no actual answer, just the number two. but then again we also have to take into account the grammatical error of "tell the answer to 1+1" which may or may not be intentional. if it is an intentional grammatical mistake, the problem becomes more complex where as if it's not, then we come back to the "no answer" answer with just the simplification of the term 1+1. supposing the grammatical error was intentional, if we "tell the answer to 1+1" it's as if we're treating the term "1+1" or "2" as a noun. in that case comes into the equation an "invisible problem" which we need to solve, derive an "answer" for, to be able to tell the answer to the term "2". in this case, since the statement was a response to "What part of the plant sprouts roots?", we can figure out the answer to that question first through some research first and foremost. as for telling the answer to "2", or "1+1", a number of interpretations can be derived. you could be telling the answer to two different people, the second poster of this thread, or just this page in general as the topic right now is on its second page, and so on and so forth. but Borg was the one asking the question, and the one who needed the answer. so is there a connection between Borg and the number "2" or the term "1+1"? well Borg has a karma of "2", his full name jeremy borg, including the space, has a total of 11 characters which can be attributed to a duller, more literal rather than mathematical translation of "one and one", AND going further with the "one and one" translation of the term, Borg will graduate from notre dame catholic secondary school in the year of 2011. two thousand and 11.
so can only logically conclude that either there is no actual answer but a simplified form of the term "1+1", or we misconstrued what you were trying to say and was actually looking to see if anybody had an answer for borg.
Uhm.. how do you know this? :-[
-
i am building a robot, i need a good base, i was thinking of buying a cheap remote controll car- stripping it and then using that base...people agree or any other ideas?
firstly, i would just like to comment on how u stayed on topic dude, nicely done...secondly i think ur idea was perfect and should do wonders, best of luck building that robot of urs...reach for the sky lilmaniac because u can do anything you can set ur mind to, you rule
-
i am building a robot, i need a good base, i was thinking of buying a cheap remote controll car- stripping it and then using that base...people agree or any other ideas?
firstly, i would just like to comment on how u stayed on topic dude, nicely done...secondly i think ur idea was perfect and should do wonders, best of luck building that robot of urs...reach for the sky lilmaniac because u can do anything you can set ur mind to, you rule
if you want to make a robot as cool as johnny 5 i would reccomend using a vcr player as its head :thumbsup:
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/319jno44POL._AA280_.jpg)
(http://www.johnny-five.com/images/sc/scenes/gas_station.jpg)
-
so if you're saying we should "tell the answer to 1+1" and there is no equal sign given, then obviously there IS NO answer. all that can be done is 1+1 is simplified down to 2, but without a proper question there's no actual answer, just the number two. but then again we also have to take into account the grammatical error of "tell the answer to 1+1" which may or may not be intentional. if it is an intentional grammatical mistake, the problem becomes more complex where as if it's not, then we come back to the "no answer" answer with just the simplification of the term 1+1. supposing the grammatical error was intentional, if we "tell the answer to 1+1" it's as if we're treating the term "1+1" or "2" as a noun. in that case comes into the equation an "invisible problem" which we need to solve, derive an "answer" for, to be able to tell the answer to the term "2". in this case, since the statement was a response to "What part of the plant sprouts roots?", we can figure out the answer to that question first through some research first and foremost. as for telling the answer to "2", or "1+1", a number of interpretations can be derived. you could be telling the answer to two different people, the second poster of this thread, or just this page in general as the topic right now is on its second page, and so on and so forth. but Borg was the one asking the question, and the one who needed the answer. so is there a connection between Borg and the number "2" or the term "1+1"? well Borg has a karma of "2", his full name jeremy borg, including the space, has a total of 11 characters which can be attributed to a duller, more literal rather than mathematical translation of "one and one", AND going further with the "one and one" translation of the term, Borg will graduate from notre dame catholic secondary school in the year of 2011. two thousand and 11.
so can only logically conclude that either there is no actual answer but a simplified form of the term "1+1", or we misconstrued what you were trying to say and was actually looking to see if anybody had an answer for borg.
Uhm.. how do you know this? :-[
for info on you? that's facebook my friend.... haha.
-
i am building a robot, i need a good base, i was thinking of buying a cheap remote controll car- stripping it and then using that base...people agree or any other ideas?
firstly, i would just like to comment on how u stayed on topic dude, nicely done...secondly i think ur idea was perfect and should do wonders, best of luck building that robot of urs...reach for the sky lilmaniac because u can do anything you can set ur mind to, you rule
this post is funny and sad in a way
-
so if you're saying we should "tell the answer to 1+1" and there is no equal sign given, then obviously there IS NO answer. all that can be done is 1+1 is simplified down to 2, but without a proper question there's no actual answer, just the number two. but then again we also have to take into account the grammatical error of "tell the answer to 1+1" which may or may not be intentional. if it is an intentional grammatical mistake, the problem becomes more complex where as if it's not, then we come back to the "no answer" answer with just the simplification of the term 1+1. supposing the grammatical error was intentional, if we "tell the answer to 1+1" it's as if we're treating the term "1+1" or "2" as a noun. in that case comes into the equation an "invisible problem" which we need to solve, derive an "answer" for, to be able to tell the answer to the term "2". in this case, since the statement was a response to "What part of the plant sprouts roots?", we can figure out the answer to that question first through some research first and foremost. as for telling the answer to "2", or "1+1", a number of interpretations can be derived. you could be telling the answer to two different people, the second poster of this thread, or just this page in general as the topic right now is on its second page, and so on and so forth. but Borg was the one asking the question, and the one who needed the answer. so is there a connection between Borg and the number "2" or the term "1+1"? well Borg has a karma of "2", his full name jeremy borg, including the space, has a total of 11 characters which can be attributed to a duller, more literal rather than mathematical translation of "one and one", AND going further with the "one and one" translation of the term, Borg will graduate from notre dame catholic secondary school in the year of 2011. two thousand and 11.
so can only logically conclude that either there is no actual answer but a simplified form of the term "1+1", or we misconstrued what you were trying to say and was actually looking to see if anybody had an answer for borg.
Uhm.. how do you know this? :-[
for info on you? that's facebook my friend.... haha.
Oh shit, just noticed you're Edward Yoon.
-
tito, its all sadness and no laughter :'( :'( :'(
-
K back on topics boys, remember.
-
the last time i went on topic, i had to respond to myself for help
-
the last time i went on topic, i had to respond to myself for help
lmao, so what does everyone study at school/college?
i go to college, and study media, business and law.
-
Next semester:
psychology
sociology
biology
chemistry
us history 1865-till (I think)
-
Now I have a very serious problem
I'll take an MARXISM AND MAOISM exam tonight!!!
Oh my god, who cares about such nasty -isms. I know almost nothing about it.
Fxxk! :bang:
-
Is that like Marxism-Leninism?
-
back to topic boys. now lets all help lilmanic
-
Is that like Marxism-Leninism?
exactly. even worse, Maozedong ism, Dengxiaoping ism, Jiangzemin ism. These suck.
Now just leave me along, as moby said, let's help liminiac
-
Göran Perssonism is far better.
lilmaniac i suggest you to contact McGuyver
-
back to topic boys. now lets all help lilmanic
no one takes you seriously Moby
-
Göran Perssonism is far better.
lilmaniac i suggest you to contact McGuyver
hahahha :banana:
tito shut up! some buddy has to close this thread
-
Göran Perssonism is far better.
lilmaniac i suggest you to contact McGuyver
hahahha :banana:
i bet he didn't even read you post
-
Göran Perssonism is far better.
lilmaniac i suggest you to contact McGuyver
hahahha :banana:
i bet he didn't even read you post
i believe it spellt your post
-
no you post
-
i got a prob, what's 1+1? 11 right? xD
-
Melvyn, what's your problem. you n00b
look at the damn date of the last post! and btw, not funny. :booty:
-
Melvyn, what's your problem. you n00b
look at the damn date of the last post! and btw, not funny. :booty:
ok ok i promise i'll stop :rockit:
-
too late you already started why stop now
-
Melvyn, what's your problem. you n00b
look at the damn date of the last post! and btw, not funny. :booty:
Is tht ur ass or ur face ur mooning him with?
Ahahaha....
But seriously....I need some help with SOH CAH TOA... its that sin, cos tan thing that u use with triangles...I am completely clueless as to how it works and the entire point of it..
-
Melvyn, what's your problem. you n00b
look at the damn date of the last post! and btw, not funny. :booty:
Is tht ur ass or ur face ur mooning him with?
Ahahaha....
But seriously....I need some help with SOH CAH TOA... its that sin, cos tan thing that u use with triangles...I am completely clueless as to how it works and the entire point of it..
This is easy, its basically what you said, the three sin, cos and tan rules. Its used when finding the length of an angle or side on a right angled triangle.
SOH = opposite/hypotenuse
CAH = adjacent/hypotenuse
TOA = opposite/adjacent
The opposite side is the side opposite of the angle given or the angle you need to find (not the right angle). Adjacent is the side next to the angle given or the angle you have to find. And the hypotenuse is the longest side or the side opposite of the right angle.
When using SOH CAH TOA to find the length of a side:
This is hard cuz i cant demonstrate with triangles, but il try my best.
Example 1
Say if the angle give is 46 degrees. You are given the hypotenuse which is 24m and you are trying to find the opposite.
You will make an equation which will look like this:
sin 46 = opposite/24m
therefore
opposite = sin 46 x 24
It should = 17.26m
Note: You use the sin rule because you are given the hypotenuse, and you are trying to find the opposite (SOH = opposite/hypotenuse) If you were trying to find the adjacent than it would be the cos rule. And so on...
Using SOH CAH TOA to find an angle
Basically its same thing, except with a few extra calculations.
Example 2
We will use the same example as above except the angle is not known.
So we use the SOH, where x is the unknown angle.
sin x = 17.26/24
= 0.7193398
The extra calculation is this part:
Now from here im using my calculater, it may be different from yours, but since i dont know yours il do it how i do it with mine.
For finding the size of an angle from here you go:
[SHIFT][SIN] 0.7193398
Than you press the equal button.
You should get 46 degrees. Which confirms with the first example we used. Same thing goes with tan and cos when finding the angle.
Forgive me if im off, havnt used SOH CAH TOA for a long time.
-
nerds...
-
nerds...
You wont see me helping out with anything more advance than SOH CAH TOA
-
nerds...
You wont see me helping out with anything more advance than SOH CAH TOA
God I hated that...I'm dropping math next year :biggrin:
-
Wow look at how much of a nerd I am.
:saywhat:
-
Wow look at how much of a nerd I am.
:saywhat:
well if i can believe owens story, then you got 51 karma in just more than a week ;) so you must be an awesome dude
and about the math thing: two years ago i had a 10 for a test about ginometry (that sin cos tan shit). so as a self-called-expert i say that what is already said about it is true :cheers:
-
Wow look at how much of a nerd I am.
:saywhat:
well if i can believe owens story, then you got 51 karma in just more than a week ;) so you must be an awesome dude
Thanks, but where is Owens story?
-
Wow look at how much of a nerd I am.
:saywhat:
well if i can believe owens story, then you got 51 karma in just more than a week ;) so you must be an awesome dude
and about the math thing: two years ago i had a 10 for a test about ginometry (that sin cos tan shit). so as a self-called-expert i say that what is already said about it is true :cheers:
There was a guy named Finnery who got over a 100 karma in less than a week :thumbsup:
-
Wow look at how much of a nerd I am.
:saywhat:
well if i can believe owens story, then you got 51 karma in just more than a week ;) so you must be an awesome dude
Thanks
you would want to know what he did for that
Borg can sometime look hot when your drunk :-*
-
I am so fucking confused! :down:
-
Wow look at how much of a nerd I am.
:saywhat:
well if i can believe owens story, then you got 51 karma in just more than a week ;) so you must be an awesome dude
and about the math thing: two years ago i had a 10 for a test about ginometry (that sin cos tan shit). so as a self-called-expert i say that what is already said about it is true :cheers:
There was a guy named Finnery who got over a 100 karma in less than a week :thumbsup:
btw what happened to him. there are so many members that just disappeared :o
-
I think you mean trigonometry, sander
-
Wow look at how much of a nerd I am.
:saywhat:
well if i can believe owens story, then you got 51 karma in just more than a week ;) so you must be an awesome dude
Thanks, but where is Owens story?
page 2 of this tread, but i just saw that he posted it on 22 dec 2007 and not 2008, so it was 51 karma in a year. so i was wrong :'(
I think you mean trigonometry, sander
yes you're right tf10. i'm sometimes not really sure for some of the english mathematical terms