Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum
Freestyle Soccer Forum => Freestyle Videos => Topic started by: NickZ on Apr 25, 2009, 06:05: AM
-
Yesterday SSD released a new trick video.
In that video the Ninja atw looked like a aatw
This is a better view :biggrin:
If someone wants to know how i came up with this trick ask me.
Nick zieren
-
your style is just amaing, but the only difference i see is the way you whip your leg around, really cool trick
-
Thank you, if you try the beginning with a crossover it looks really different.
But at this moment i have a bad style at that one..
-
i still see aatw
-
Isn't that just X-over -atw nt? :dontknow:
-
holy shit i love it
now i see it for sure
really sik man
and nice cero 2 song :thumbsup:
-
i still see aatw
well look closer at the slow motion part, it's like x-over atw nt but in a fluent movement and without putting ur foot down in between
looks awesome! :thumbsup:
-
Isn't that just X-over -atw nt? :dontknow:
dito! :dontknow:
-
no, its not aatw...
defenilty not...
aatw starts with rev cross...this trick starts with xcross...
-
similar
-
i love this trick man
and yeah it looks like a ninja kick or something haha
congrats man
-
That was pretty stylish man! :thumbsup: :cheers:
-
ooo yeh i just saw on youtube someone said do it with rathino atw and i agree that would be some move
-
wats the difference between this and x over-atw nt .... anyway i cud have never got wat u were doing if u dint slow mo it hehe
amazing style tho
-
why hating?
it's said a lot of times but if you do atw-cross nt it's a tatw(but then in 1 fluent movement)
so why not on (crossover)xover-atw nt? (also in 1 fluent movement)
Actually I see Tatw as hatw-Cross nt. But I'm not trying to hate. It looks very stylish.
-
yes. It is a new move. X-over ATW nt. I wonder why nobody has come up with that one before. But you did, and that's really amazing.
-
wow it took me so long to understand this isn't a normal aatw. I just didn't look closely enough.. But now I see the difference, it looks awesome! Great new trick Nick! :cheers:
-
Fuck I wanted to be first on this trick! :cursing: JK, great! I've thought about, but I've never been able to do it. Congrats!
-
Great trick!! looks amazing! :thumbsup:
-
ninja my bro :thumbsup: very nice trick !!! peace bro :cheers:
-
ok ok NickZ , I see ;)
o my is very old...you would not copy.. :biggrin:
-
okay wait where is the x-over wtf :S u meen reverse crossover or what :dontknow:
-
Isn't that just X-over -atw nt? :dontknow:
EXACTLY.
who are they kiddin'... they invented a new trick :booty: NOT!!!
-
Isn't that just X-over -atw nt? :dontknow:
dito! :dontknow:
aren't basically all atw tricks like tatw, matw, aatw, etc. just some type combo nt? yes they are, and there is reason we call this a trick not a combo. its silly to say this is just combo.
-
this is nicks ninja atw
-
i love it, very stylish, ima use it often :thumbsup:
-
Isn't that just X-over -atw nt? :dontknow:
dito! :dontknow:
aren't basically all atw tricks like tatw, matw, aatw, etc. just some type combo nt? yes they are, and there is reason we call this a trick not a combo. its silly to say this is just combo.
Thank you! finally a clever person
btw really cool move
-
awesome trick man, looks sweet. its not xover-atw nt, ppl have done that, they land on the ground and do the atw nt. but this is different, well done. kool name also ;)
-
eeh ninja fucking stylish trick man! jouwn verdienste! :thumbsup:
-
Nick this is just AATW :dontknow:
Joke balhaartje, stylish :thumbsup:
(Mijn bal)
-
It looks pretty slick I gotta say.
But lets be honest, there is not too much difference between this and AATW, at least not enough to call it a new trick, thats my 2 cents.
-
x-over atw nt,
but I think its a new trick because it basicly has the same diffrence as tatw and atw-cross nt
-
It looks pretty slick I gotta say.
But lets be honest, there is not too much difference between this and AATW, at least not enough to call it a new trick, thats my 2 cents.
second that!
-
It looks pretty slick I gotta say.
But lets be honest, there is not too much difference between this and AATW, at least not enough to call it a new trick, thats my 2 cents.
I think its very different
-
It looks pretty slick I gotta say.
But lets be honest, there is not too much difference between this and AATW, at least not enough to call it a new trick, thats my 2 cents.
I think its very different
but you wont recognize it when its done in a combo. and for the crossover version... skora has aready done this in his part 4... must be 2 or 3 years ago.
-
Your words, your words..
skora.. [0.40] that is hhtw-outside atw..
-
reli creative thinkin instead of makin it like x over - atw nt u put it more in 1 flow so i wud class it as a new variation otherwize you could just say matw is just atw co nt
-
i think it's a smooth x-over atw nt :cheers:
nice one nick
-
Your words, your words..
skora.. [0.40] that is hhtw-outside atw..
i dont think cross atw nt in your motion would look that different.... but show me and teach me i'm wrong.
-
Nick does x-over atw nt in abbas motion,
it is thesame diffrence between Nicks trick and x-over-atw nt as it is between abbasaroundtheworld and revcross-atw nt
-
ooo yeh i just saw on youtube someone said do it with rathino atw and i agree that would be some move
that was me :biggrin: