Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum
Soccer => Soccer Forum => Topic started by: Tito on Mar 20, 2009, 09:18: PM
-
This we talk about all the transfer deal that shaped, for better or for worse, the careers of many footbalers around the globe.
(Currently playing football)
Topic of Discussion:
Negative: Florent Malouda
(http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/1513/99085896.jpg)
Did Malouda screw his career with the move to Chelsea?
Positive: Andrie Arshavin
(http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/3884/54795763.jpg)
Since his move to Arsenal after a slow start he has found his touch.
As some say he will only get better, is this the case?
-
Malouda DID screw his career by going to Chelsea
he always played much better at Lyon and really hasnt even done anything yet
-
he always played much better at Lyon and really hasnt even done anything yet
That's because he's not good enough for the premier league. Bad player in my opinion.
-
Wow thats a bold statement!
Malouda was a great player at Lyon and was in great form maybe his not suitable for English football but to say his not a good player thats obscene!
Anyway what your view on the other half.
Arshavin
In good form as of late, and with his slow start credited to the Russian league been over before his move could you see him being the next top dog of the EPL?
-
maybe not top dog but definately it'll help Arsenal because they'll have just another threat offensively (walcott,v.persie, adebayor, nasri, fabregas, etc)
if future teams dont take him seriously enough then he can easily make them pay with a goal or two
-
maybe not top dog but definately it'll help Arsenal because they'll have just another threat offensively (walcott,v.persie, adebayor, nasri, fabregas, etc)
to be honest i rate him better than Nasri, Walcott and posibily Adebayor
-
maybe not top dog but definately it'll help Arsenal because they'll have just another threat offensively (walcott,v.persie, adebayor, nasri, fabregas, etc)
to be honest i rate him better than Nasri, Walcott and posibily Adebayor
adebayor is good for nothing, i used to like him but his many injuries and shit are fucking him up.
another one
Donavan to Bayern Munchen
-
its only a loan move plus he will never leave LA
-
maybe not top dog but definately it'll help Arsenal because they'll have just another threat offensively (walcott,v.persie, adebayor, nasri, fabregas, etc)
to be honest i rate him better than Nasri, Walcott and posibily Adebayor
adebayor is good for nothing, i used to like him but his many injuries and shit are fucking him up.
another one
Donavan to Bayern Munchen
I actually hate adebayor but i added his name for the sake of not starting an un-related argument
Silly buy by Bayern
Just another reason to show Podolski hes not wanted
-
at least someone agree's with me about adebayor
what about Podolski to Colon FC? Career breaker in my opinion
-
His move to Bayern was a career breaker he didn't benefit one bit from it but i agree he should leave for a bigger club
-
bayern wouldnt give him to anywhere else
he either went to koln or stayed at munich
Roma were interested and it looks like they need him now (firepower up front)
-
Roma got too many injuries
wouldn't be surprised if we don't make it the CL next season
plus our budget is extremely low even for a second division team after the death of our previous owner
-
Flamini to Milan
i think that was the worst career breaker i've seen, i always thought highly of flamini, now look at him :down:
-
he should've stayed at Arsenal and both have suffered Flamini and Arsenal
but i always knew that signing for future reasons but i still think its awful for Flamini
-
his fault really
he went for money and shunned away first team football with Arsenal where he had a great campaign
-
he should've stayed at Arsenal and both have suffered Flamini and Arsenal
but i always knew that signing for future reasons but i still think its awful for Flamini
exactly what i'm trying to say.
he should have known he cant compete with seedorf, pirlo etc
-
Gattuso
is the main man but his injuried now so Flamini still isn't getting much game time that's sad
-
too many stars in ac milan
so easy to substitute gattuso with the current squad milan has
flamini would have become a star in arsenal then fit in milan
as a rising star, he doesn't have much chance
especially since he plays for center midfield
btw, random question
is it correct grammar saying something like "would've" or "could've" or "should've"
coz I was gonna say flamini would've become
but I don't really remember if it's right
mozilla firefox spelling checker says it's wrong
:booty: :dontknow:
-
depends on the context and what ur trying to say
-
your right would have and would've are the same