Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum
Freestyle Soccer Forum => Freestyle Chat => Topic started by: imagestyles on Feb 18, 2009, 03:30: AM
-
The only nt combos I can do at the moment are cross-htw, cross-atw, Tatw-atw and Matw-atw. How can I start to get matw-matw(nt) and so on? It doesn't seem like my feet are fast enough. I don't know if it's my touch or what. :dontknow:
-
it is just practicing, timing and speed
-
start with Cross matw nt! :3some:
-
start with cross amatw or cross atatw nt theyre the easiest
-
start with cross amatw or cross atatw nt theyre the easiest
I would say that cross-matw(nt) is the easiest, because when doing cross-atatw(nt) or -amatw(nt), you have to involve your weak foot at the first or the second trick. So personally I would say to start with cross-matw(nt).
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
-
Thanks for all the feedback! My style is okay... but not great.
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion
-
i mean, i agree with Sven :thumbsup:
(ofcourse i agree with Sven :cheers:)
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion
it will take more time for him... it's his decision
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?
and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?
and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.
patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?
and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.
patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...
If it isn't style, what is it then? I agree with Fee.
and about this:
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion
it will take more time for him... it's his decision
More time to do what? I would rather take more time to get consistant at easier tricks, to get a better style when trying to do more difficult tricks. Of course, if he skips cross-matw(nt) and immediately goes to matw-matw(nt), it will take less time for him to get this combo, but what's the point of it if he has no good style on it. I agree that he can do whatever he wants, but isn't it our job to give him advices that he will take advantage most? Otherwise he wouldn't have asked us to tell him.
-
Here's my newest video: feature=channel_page
Tell me if my style is bad or not...
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?
and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.
patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...
If it isn't style, what is it then? I agree with Fee.
and about this:
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion
it will take more time for him... it's his decision
More time to do what? I would rather take more time to get consistant at easier tricks, to get a better style when trying to do more difficult tricks. Of course, if he skips cross-matw(nt) and immediately goes to matw-matw(nt), it will take less time for him to get this combo, but what's the point of it if he has no good style on it. I agree that he can do whatever he wants, but isn't it our job to give him advices that he will take advantage most? Otherwise he wouldn't have asked us to tell him.
it means that you have to practice patw more, because you haven't got 'extra time' after it...
more time to do cross-matw nt and then matw-matw nt. Maybe he will have pretty nice style without cross-matw nt, don't be so consider
-
maybe, but maybe not.
just do what ever you want, but my advice is to start with the easiert one.
or do you start with amatw-amatw nt before you can do cross-amatwnt?
i don´t think so :thumbsup:
i´m out of that discussion
-
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?
and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.
patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...
If it isn't style, what is it then? I agree with Fee.
and about this:
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion
it will take more time for him... it's his decision
More time to do what? I would rather take more time to get consistant at easier tricks, to get a better style when trying to do more difficult tricks. Of course, if he skips cross-matw(nt) and immediately goes to matw-matw(nt), it will take less time for him to get this combo, but what's the point of it if he has no good style on it. I agree that he can do whatever he wants, but isn't it our job to give him advices that he will take advantage most? Otherwise he wouldn't have asked us to tell him.
it means that you have to practice patw more, because you haven't got 'extra time' after it...
more time to do cross-matw nt and then matw-matw nt. Maybe he will have pretty nice style without cross-matw nt, don't be so consider
I can guarantee you that almost everyone who does matw-matw(nt) before cross-matw(nt) has a bad style on matw-matw(nt), it would look sloppy..
-
maybe, but maybe not.
just do what ever you want, but my advice is to start with the easiert one.
or do you start with amatw-amatw nt before you can do cross-amatwnt?
i don´t think so :thumbsup:
i´m out of that discussion
A lot of people do this, but you can see the result.
But just let it be as it is, everyone has his opinion. :thumbsup:
-
maybe, but maybe not.
just do what ever you want, but my advice is to start with the easiert one.
or do you start with amatw-amatw nt before you can do cross-amatwnt?
i don´t think so :thumbsup:
i´m out of that discussion
yeah, I have done amatw-amatw nt before cross-amatw nt
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
worst example ever.
so do you think if i have a good style that i can do my first patw with perfect style?
and my advice is to start with cross-matw nt, the easiest one and it´s helpfull for other combos like cross-amatwnt ... too.
patw is a trick on speed, matw nt - on timing (you don't need to move your legs fast)... and what do you mean about 'perfect style on patw'? Maybe it will lok like tb in the end, but it isn't style...
If it isn't style, what is it then? I agree with Fee.
and about this:
I would say start with matw-matw nt, not with cross-matw nt, it will be more useful I think
Maybe more useful, but I can guarantee if he starts with matw-matw(nt) it will be really bad style, because you have less time to complete matw-matw(nt).
if he already has good style, he will do it stylish... if he has problems with style - anyway he needs to repair it
he said he only can do tatw atw nt and that kinda nt's if he practise cross matw nt and he can do it easily he can try matw matw nt, tatw matw nt! :thumbsup:
thats my opinion
it will take more time for him... it's his decision
More time to do what? I would rather take more time to get consistant at easier tricks, to get a better style when trying to do more difficult tricks. Of course, if he skips cross-matw(nt) and immediately goes to matw-matw(nt), it will take less time for him to get this combo, but what's the point of it if he has no good style on it. I agree that he can do whatever he wants, but isn't it our job to give him advices that he will take advantage most? Otherwise he wouldn't have asked us to tell him.
it means that you have to practice patw more, because you haven't got 'extra time' after it...
more time to do cross-matw nt and then matw-matw nt. Maybe he will have pretty nice style without cross-matw nt, don't be so consider
I can guarantee you that almost everyone who does matw-matw(nt) before cross-matw(nt) has a bad style on matw-matw(nt), it would look sloppy..
I have done matw-matw nt before cross matw nt, and it looked pretty nice
-
Start with getting your lip pierced. ;)
P.S. You can do tatw-atw ot tatw-atw nt? You didn't specify, lol. Anyway, you have to jump higher when doing matw nt after something - practice your kamatws first.
-
Here's my newest video: feature=channel_page
Tell me if my style is bad or not...
style is really good! :thumbsup:
-
Yeah I agree with Sven, Fee and Chris. Start with co-matw(nt) first. When you've mastered that, and you can do it with good style, then I suggest that you start with co-amatw(nt) and co-atatw(nt). But as the other have mentioned: These nt combos involve a left foot trick, either co or amatw/atatw. But remember, practise these combos before trying matw-matw(nt) or tatw-amatw(nt) or whatever. I remember I used to struggle ALOT with tatw-matw (nt). It was very sloppy. And then I practised only co-matw (nt) for a week and it looked much better after that :thumbsup:
Btw: Your style is really good man! Looking forward to your next video:)
-
Yeah I agree with Sven, Fee and Chris. Start with co-matw(nt) first. When you've mastered that, and you can do it with good style, then I suggest that you start with co-amatw(nt) and co-atatw(nt). But as the other have mentioned: These nt combos involve a left foot trick, either co or amatw/atatw. But remember, practise these combos before trying matw-matw(nt) or tatw-amatw(nt) or whatever. I remember I used to struggle ALOT with tatw-matw (nt). It was very sloppy. And then I practised only co-matw (nt) for a week and it looked much better after that :thumbsup:
Btw: Your style is really good man! Looking forward to your next video:)
Thanks for the tips!Here's my newest video: feature=channel_page
Tell me if my style is bad or not...
style is really good! :thumbsup:
Thanks, Christiaan :thumbsup:
-
In my opinion you have to start with cross-matw nt, when you have done this a couple of times (15 times er something) you will see that you gets faster. Now you have to improve your matw, this trick must be done really fast and high so first you have to practise this trick till you can do this trick fast and high.
Question: isn't it easier to begin with tatw-matw nt instead of matw-matw nt because when you do tatw-matw nt you can faster around the ball?
Succes!
-
even easyer than co-matw nt is aj-matw nt, well i did that 1 first.
-
In my opinion you have to start with cross-matw nt, when you have done this a couple of times (15 times er something) you will see that you gets faster. Now you have to improve your matw, this trick must be done really fast and high so first you have to practise this trick till you can do this trick fast and high.
Question: isn't it easier to begin with tatw-matw nt instead of matw-matw nt because when you do tatw-matw nt you can faster around the ball?Succes!
nah it depends with in style it's better to go for matw matw nt and with out style it's the inverse ^^ it's just my opinion
I do matw faster and higher coz I have in style
-
even easyer than co-matw nt is aj-matw nt, well i did that 1 first.
doing so many extra stages for getting tatw/matw-matw nt is silly I think...
-
even easyer than co-matw nt is aj-matw nt, well i did that 1 first.
doing so many extra stages for getting tatw/matw-matw nt is silly I think...
its not, it helps. He says he can't do it and he wants help. You want him to keep trying and failing, i would say he would learn matw matw nt quicker if he learnt cross matw nt.
-
even easyer than co-matw nt is aj-matw nt, well i did that 1 first.
doing so many extra stages for getting tatw/matw-matw nt is silly I think...
its not, it helps. He says he can't do it and he wants help. You want him to keep trying and failing, i would say he would learn matw matw nt quicker if he learnt cross matw nt.
I learnt all nts not from crosses or airejesters, I think it didn't take soooo much time to me
-
even easyer than co-matw nt is aj-matw nt, well i did that 1 first.
doing so many extra stages for getting tatw/matw-matw nt is silly I think...
its not, it helps. He says he can't do it and he wants help. You want him to keep trying and failing, i would say he would learn matw matw nt quicker if he learnt cross matw nt.
I learnt all nts not from crosses or airejesters, I think it didn't take soooo much time to me
Yeah maybe you did, and thats good.. But you probaby didn't asked for help, like this guy did! Then we'll have to help him as much as possible, and in my opinion saying: "Just practise tatw-matw(nt)", is not a very good tip.
No offense=)
-
matw(nt) tricks are like my favorite moves atm, i do squillions of them... and i started by doing cross-atw(nt) and then moving on to cross-matw(nt)... get super consistant at cross-matw(nt) and then tatw-matw(nt) should be no problem :)
-
start with Cross matw nt! :3some:
yh or cross amatw thats wat i did
good luck :thumbsup:
-
Dude, what's your MSN?
-
matw(nt) tricks are like my favorite moves atm, i do squillions of them... and i started by doing cross-atw(nt) and then moving on to cross-matw(nt)... get super consistent at cross-matw(nt) and then tatw-matw(nt) should be no problem :)
Thanks BevS. Your Matw (nt)'s are crazy! :thumbsup:
-
Dude, what's your MSN?
Who was that to?
-
matw(nt) tricks are like my favorite moves atm, i do squillions of them... and i started by doing cross-atw(nt) and then moving on to cross-matw(nt)... get super consistent at cross-matw(nt) and then tatw-matw(nt) should be no problem :)
Thanks BevS. Your Matw (nt)'s are crazy! :thumbsup:
thanks man, np ;)
-
Dude, what's your MSN?
Who was that to?
You!
-
i think it's mostly about about touch but speed is also important just get the right timing with the right touch and u will get it :biggrin:
-
Dude, what's your MSN?
Who was that to?
You!
Imagefreestyle@hotmail.com. I just made it last week. :biggrin: