Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum
Freestyle Soccer Forum => Freestyle Videos => Topic started by: ufmkarim on Jan 23, 2009, 11:11: PM
-
-
not the cleanest. but the tutorial it self was not bad.
-
WOOW NEW TRICK AHMATW TB NT!!!!!!!
but seriously if he worked on his style he wouldnt be bad at all
-
if u make a tutorial on a trick u need to master it
-
What's the song ? :biggrin:
-
if u make a tutorial on a trick u need to master it
Agreed
-
if u make a tutorial on a trick u need to master it
Agreed
agreed more than anything
-
his satw didn't even have a higher ahmatw... :rolleyes:
-
I think is useless to do a tutorial about a hard trick like this
-
What's the song ? :biggrin:
the song is outlawz - real talk
to the tutorial:
the satw looked weird. it seemed like he didn't kick the ball up, the ball just when on the ground and jumped up :dontknow:
-
the video is wrong. its not the way to learn satw.. if you practice it like its ahmatw it will just be a ahmatw htw combo..
the correct satw is a fast htw whit a matw nt!
-
the video is wrong. its not the way to learn satw.. if you practice it like its ahmatw it will just be a ahmatw htw combo..
the correct satw is a fast htw whit a matw nt!
Yes, thats what i was thinking too! I really just think Aasheim does this tutorial to brag. He only wanna show people how "good" he is at ahmatw..
-
What's the song ? :biggrin:
the song is outlawz - real talk
to the tutorial:
the satw looked weird. it seemed like he didn't kick the ball up, the ball just when on the ground and jumped up :dontknow:
hehe, you are right... ground!
-
the video is wrong. its not the way to learn satw.. if you practice it like its ahmatw it will just be a ahmatw htw combo..
the correct satw is a fast htw whit a matw nt!
Yes, thats what i was thinking too! I really just think Aasheim does this tutorial to brag. He only wanna show people how "good" he is at ahmatw..
Wow, i`ve just wanted to write the same but seen your comments ;) Absolutely agree!! Satw isnt ahmatw-cross nt!! It`s htw-matw nt!! When you do ahmatw, you should just do very fast rotation with you one leg, touch the ground and stay this leg in this position, At the time when you did half of rotation with one leg you should jump with another leg and go around the ball... BUT when you do satw: you also should do very fast rotation with one le and than HIT the ground (not just TOUCH) - after the hit your one leg will go up and your another leg goes like in ahmatw but at the end you should kick the ball like in nt combo :) Thats all i think.. I hope it will help somebody because this video was surely done for promotion his skills not for help ;)
-
the video is wrong. its not the way to learn satw.. if you practice it like its ahmatw it will just be a ahmatw htw combo..
the correct satw is a fast htw whit a matw nt!
Yes, thats what i was thinking too! I really just think Aasheim does this tutorial to brag. He only wanna show people how "good" he is at ahmatw..
Wow, i`ve just wanted to write the same but seen your comments ;) Absolutely agree!! Satw isnt ahmatw-cross nt!! It`s htw-matw nt!! When you do ahmatw, you should just do very fast rotation with you one leg, touch the ground and stay this leg in this position, At the time when you did half of rotation with one leg you should jump with another leg and go around the ball... BUT when you do satw: you also should do very fast rotation with one le and than HIT the ground (not just TOUCH) - after the hit your one leg will go up and your another leg goes like in ahmatw but at the end you should kick the ball like in nt combo :) Thats all i think.. I hope it will help somebody because this video was surely done for promotion his skills not for help ;)
I almost agree with you, but Satw is htw AMATW nt, not htw MATW nt :) htw matw nt would be an almatw.
btw, very bad tutorial. in my view it's necessary to master the trick and then do a tutorial, not the other way round :)
-
the video is wrong. its not the way to learn satw.. if you practice it like its ahmatw it will just be a ahmatw htw combo..
the correct satw is a fast htw whit a matw nt!
Yes, thats what i was thinking too! I really just think Aasheim does this tutorial to brag. He only wanna show people how "good" he is at ahmatw..
Wow, i`ve just wanted to write the same but seen your comments ;) Absolutely agree!! Satw isnt ahmatw-cross nt!! It`s htw-matw nt!! When you do ahmatw, you should just do very fast rotation with you one leg, touch the ground and stay this leg in this position, At the time when you did half of rotation with one leg you should jump with another leg and go around the ball... BUT when you do satw: you also should do very fast rotation with one le and than HIT the ground (not just TOUCH) - after the hit your one leg will go up and your another leg goes like in ahmatw but at the end you should kick the ball like in nt combo :) Thats all i think.. I hope it will help somebody because this video was surely done for promotion his skills not for help ;)
I almost agree with you, but Satw is htw AMATW nt, not htw MATW nt :) htw matw nt would be an almatw.
btw, very bad tutorial. in my view it's necessary to master the trick and then do a tutorial, not the other way round :)
Sorry, but you are wrong! ahmatw=htw-atw nt, alatw=htw=htw nt, satw=htw-matw nt, almatw=htw-almatw nt! This thimg was discussed many times on this forum so don`t argue about it because it`s true for 100% ;)
-
Skora atw= hhtw matw nt
You can say what you want..
-
oh some young freestyle professors.
-
lol what are you talking about :) when you do, for example, HTW ATW (not nt), you do it with your one leg. so we can call this (if right leg), Right HTW to Right Atw. If we do it by NT, it will be ALATW (HTW ATW NT)! Consequently, when we wanna do ALMATW, we do HTW MATW NT! Because it's the same leg! HTW AMATW NT is SATW.
I am not able to express all of my thoughs in english, but I hope you'll get my point of view.
ARS, think about it by yourself, not by the opinion of others' users who don't know what they talk about :)
-
lol what are you talking about :) when you do, for example, HTW ATW (not nt), you do it with your one leg. so we can call this (if right leg), Right HTW to Right Atw. If we do it by NT, it will be ALATW (HTW ATW NT)! Consequently, when we wanna do ALMATW, we do HTW MATW NT! Because it's the same leg! HTW AMATW NT is SATW.
I am not able to express all of my thoughs in english, but I hope you'll get my point of view.
ARS, think about it by yourself, not by the opinion of others' users who don't know what they talk about :)
we should count from the last touch and name trick accroding the last touch was done... that's why alatw=htw-htw nt (becoz there's no touch between them - NT!), and so on... SATW=htw-matw nt (there's NT and 2nd trick (MATW) is done by kicked up foot (started trick))
-
lol what are you talking about :) when you do, for example, HTW ATW (not nt), you do it with your one leg. so we can call this (if right leg), Right HTW to Right Atw. If we do it by NT, it will be ALATW (HTW ATW NT)! Consequently, when we wanna do ALMATW, we do HTW MATW NT! Because it's the same leg! HTW AMATW NT is SATW.
I am not able to express all of my thoughs in english, but I hope you'll get my point of view.
ARS, think about it by yourself, not by the opinion of others' users who don't know what they talk about :)
we should count from the last touch and name trick accroding the last touch was done... that's why alatw=htw-htw nt (becoz there's no touch between them - NT!), and so on... SATW=htw-matw nt (there's NT and 2nd trick (MATW) is done by kicked up foot (started trick))
Wow, the first sensible opinion. Yes, it can be like you said, but I think that when you're doing alatw, after doing the first htw, this htw is done, so we should call the next trick from the previous one, not from the first touch. In fact, nobody has said how it must be called ;) Sorry for offtop.
-
lol what are you talking about :) when you do, for example, HTW ATW (not nt), you do it with your one leg. so we can call this (if right leg), Right HTW to Right Atw. If we do it by NT, it will be ALATW (HTW ATW NT)! Consequently, when we wanna do ALMATW, we do HTW MATW NT! Because it's the same leg! HTW AMATW NT is SATW.
I am not able to express all of my thoughs in english, but I hope you'll get my point of view.
ARS, think about it by yourself, not by the opinion of others' users who don't know what they talk about :)
we should count from the last touch and name trick accroding the last touch was done... that's why alatw=htw-htw nt (becoz there's no touch between them - NT!), and so on... SATW=htw-matw nt (there's NT and 2nd trick (MATW) is done by kicked up foot (started trick))
Wow, the first sensible opinion. Yes, it can be like you said, but I think that when you're doing alatw, after doing the first htw, this htw is done, so we should call the next trick from the previous one, not from the first touch. In fact, nobody has said how it must be called ;) Sorry for offtop.
Hmm, yes, but most people think like I wrote and it's right I think. Anyway, everybode think like he wants but because of it there can be many problems in realizing tricks and combos...
-
Skora atw= hhtw matw nt
-
skora atw = skora atw
tards.
-
Lol, all of you have no life.
-
skora atw = skora atw
tards.
hehe, some topics ago and read there... hate alternative opinions...
-
the reason i talked about the name.. was for understanding how to practice a correct satw.. not to start a argument what the trick is supose to be called and so on.
if you practice like you add something to ahmatw. then you get the wrong movement.
just think that the trick should be landed like you land matw or amatw...
the name is SATW! ;)
peace!
-
Well....
Where is the crossover according
to the video? :dontknow:
-
tutorial for tricks should be made after mastering... record one satw and two ahmatw´s and than make the tutorial with slow motion is useless... and should be better done with English there... try something different than WMM... just advice, I dont mean it bad;)
to name... just hhtw-matw (nt)... believe to masters (Azun) who should know the best advices...
-
the video is wrong. its not the way to learn satw.. if you practice it like its ahmatw it will just be a ahmatw htw combo..
the correct satw is a fast htw whit a matw nt!
Yes, thats what i was thinking too! I really just think Aasheim does this tutorial to brag. He only wanna show people how "good" he is at ahmatw..
Wow, i`ve just wanted to write the same but seen your comments ;) Absolutely agree!! Satw isnt ahmatw-cross nt!! It`s htw-matw nt!! When you do ahmatw, you should just do very fast rotation with you one leg, touch the ground and stay this leg in this position, At the time when you did half of rotation with one leg you should jump with another leg and go around the ball... BUT when you do satw: you also should do very fast rotation with one le and than HIT the ground (not just TOUCH) - after the hit your one leg will go up and your another leg goes like in ahmatw but at the end you should kick the ball like in nt combo :) Thats all i think.. I hope it will help somebody because this video was surely done for promotion his skills not for help ;)
I almost agree with you, but Satw is htw AMATW nt, not htw MATW nt :) htw matw nt would be an almatw.
btw, very bad tutorial. in my view it's necessary to master the trick and then do a tutorial, not the other way round :)
ur stupid it's htw matw nt :pimp: htw amatw nt is almatw u retard
-
tutorial for tricks should be made after mastering... record one satw and two ahmatw´s and than make the tutorial with slow motion is useless... and should be better done with English there... try something different than WMM... just advice, I dont mean it bad;)
to name... just hhtw-matw (nt)... believe to masters (Azun) who should know the best advices...
:lol: everyone who mastered it can give best advices...