Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum
Freestyle Soccer Forum => Freestyle Videos => Topic started by: Bov on Sep 12, 2008, 12:25: AM
-
Dennis atw???
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=z_cTCjX-awU
-
Without the htw at the end, its a new trick.
With the htw its a combo, imo.
-
agreed lol without htw its a trick but with it its a combo
-
Without the htw at the end, its a new trick.
With the htw its a combo, imo.
Dennis atw-htw (nt)??
-
cool trick, i'll try to learn it!! :thumbsup:
-
http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=54PrWUWHSA8 look up at 0:09, not new
-
look up at 0:09, not new
not even the same
-
its the same
-
but in another combo
-
Reversed Fx around the world.
-
its jst a weird style matw- htw nt
-
its jst a weird style matw- htw nt
lol no
-
skora did something like half hmatw. dennis did reverse fx atw
-
It looks like reserved fx atw:P but very cool
-
omg!!! you dont know a shit about freestyle, actually it is inside atw-half hop the world nt
-
it's not a revers fx around the world, because thats htatw-cross nt, this is atw(inn)-cross nt, It's a different way to do matw, and then htw nt.
Not revers fx atw.
-
htatw-cross nt is palle move :thumbsup: this trick is rev. fxatw because it's the same except that the first rotation is inside and not outside as with fxatw
-
Cool trick!! :thumbsup:
-
Not new, Matias Riksheim did it ages ago.
-
htatw-cross nt is palle move :thumbsup: this trick is rev. fxatw because it's the same except that the first rotation is inside and not outside as with fxatw
yes, in hatw-amatw nt is rev. palle trick? and palle trick is hatw-amatw nt? Fx atw is htatw-cross nt? and this is rev. Fx atw hmatw-cross nt? am i right?
-
htatw-cross nt is palle move :thumbsup: this trick is rev. fxatw because it's the same except that the first rotation is inside and not outside as with fxatw
yes, in hatw-amatw nt is rev. palle trick? and palle trick is hatw-amatw nt? Fx atw is htatw-cross nt? and this is rev. Fx atw hmatw-cross nt? am i right?
this proves you are not right. fxatw is hhtatw-cross nt. hhtatw is half hopping touzani atw. it's just like with half htw but now with htatw motion in stead of just htw
-
HOLY SH*T GUY CHILL THE FRIG OUT IF IT NOT A NEW MOVE OH WELL IT LOOKS PRETTY SICK, ENOUGH WITH HHLATW COMPLAINING
-
it's not new, it's just a combo
technically I'd say it's a half HMATW - htw (nt)
I dunno why it's half. :dontknow:
but that's what it is. Skora did H HMATW-AHMATW loooong ago. :rolleyes:
try n be more creative ma'e. But still good job on tryin to make a new atw. :thumbsup:
-
In my opinion this is half hmatw - htw
-
reverse fx atw in my opinion.
BUt still pretty good
-
I'll promis u guys it's not revfxatw! if it was rev fx atw, then he needed to do hmatw cross nt. he only did inside atw cross nt. what the fx atw, and then what dennis did, then you will see it's NOT an rev fx atw.
-
It is half hmatw for sure, done before many times, even by me. Looks great in this one :thumbsup:
-
I understand what he is trying to do hmatw-cross nt, but for me it's just atw nt cross nt....
-
becs is right, but since htatw-cross nt is called palle move, shouldnt this one be called Dennis atw? dunno if there is a "DATW", but if there is, then it could be "DEATW"
-
there is no fluent movemnt.... for me its just an ugly matw with htw nt.... but i think he wanted to do rev fx atw. but he failed.
-
there is no fluent movemnt.... for me its just an ugly matw with htw nt.... but i think he wanted to do rev fx atw. but he failed.
I'm sooooo agreee!!
-
Looks a bit like this; Just executed in a other way. Or?
-
Hey, I'm Dennis, who tried the trick ;)
I tryed on fxatw with the hmatw instead, but i got a bit slow left leg. I tried to do hmatw-cross nt, but my style after the hmatw was pretty ugly, sorry :biggrin:
-
reverse fxatw??i think here happends the same as with skatw(skalta atw) and with eatw(Eldo atw)...both tricks are the same thing except tht one rotates the first atw to the putside and the other to the inside
-
:dontknow:
:booty:
-
:potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty: :potty:
dont spamm... suck ur mums dick if u are bored.
lukita i think u wached a different with... there is nothin with eldo or skatw because there is a touch in between.
-
m4x, he means it's the same trick except that eldo atw has the first rotation inside. he tries to tell us that it's the same difference as with fxatw and half hmatw-cross nt
-
m4x, he means it's the same trick except that eldo atw has the first rotation inside. he tries to tell us that it's the same difference as with fxatw and half hmatw-cross nt
oh ok he means the reverse motion right?
-
m4x, he means it's the same trick except that eldo atw has the first rotation inside. he tries to tell us that it's the same difference as with fxatw and half hmatw-cross nt
oh ok he means the reverse motion right?
yes, the first leg the other way so it's 'reverse'
-
OMG, why most of freestylers, who has writen here their posts, don`t know anything about freestyle?? :saywhat: :dontknow: :dontknow: It`s not a new trick, it`s just a combo hatw in-cross nt-htw nt!! There is only one difference between matw-htw nt and a combo on this video - his leg hit the ground after hatw in!! Why someone say smth about Reverse FX atw?? Reverse FW atw would be hhmatw-cross nt or hatw in-half htw nt-cross nt... So, ppl, don`t write, please, if you aren`t sure that you are right...
-
OMG, why most of freestylers, who has writen here their posts, don`t know anything about freestyle?? :saywhat: :dontknow: :dontknow: It`s not a new trick, it`s just a combo hatw in-cross nt-htw nt!! There is only one difference between matw-htw nt and a combo on this video - his leg hit the ground after hatw in!! Why someone say smth about Reverse FX atw?? Reverse FW atw would be hhmatw-cross nt or hatw in-half htw nt-cross nt... So, ppl, don`t write, please, if you aren`t sure that you are right...
I believe you are right on this one. It's an old school move, very old. TomK used to do this, but outside. I dunno what you tried to do, but imo it looks like in atw - cross - htw nt , (cpmatw2 in my words) . ARS is probably right, it doesn't look much like fx or skala or any other atws, it's more of a combo. And even without the htw, it's probably a combo, because it's executed in a non-fluent move. Or am i totally wrong ?
:pimp:
-
OMG, why most of freestylers, who has writen here their posts, don`t know anything about freestyle?? :saywhat: :dontknow: :dontknow: It`s not a new trick, it`s just a combo hatw in-cross nt-htw nt!! There is only one difference between matw-htw nt and a combo on this video - his leg hit the ground after hatw in!! Why someone say smth about Reverse FX atw?? Reverse FW atw would be hhmatw-cross nt or hatw in-half htw nt-cross nt... So, ppl, don`t write, please, if you aren`t sure that you are right...
I believe you are right on this one. It's an old school move, very old. TomK used to do this, but outside. I dunno what you tried to do, but imo it looks like in atw - cross - htw nt , (cpmatw2 in my words) . ARS is probably right, it doesn't look much like fx or skala or any other atws, it's more of a combo. And even without the htw, it's probably a combo, because it's executed in a non-fluent move. Or am i totally wrong ?
:pimp:
I will have to agree with your words there. Wisely written.
-
i agree with nen