Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum
Soccer => Soccer Forum => Topic started by: cigar omar on Jun 27, 2008, 04:51: AM
-
1966 & 1974 World Cups Were Fixed - Former FIFA President
Former FIFA President Joao Havelange has made some quite sensational, and potentially damaging, allegations by claiming that the 1966 and 1974 World Cups were fixed so that England and Germany would win respectively.
The 1966 World Cup held in England has been the centre of a number of conspiracy theories over the years. These include England’s quarter final victory over Argentina when the hosts won 1-0 after the South Americans had seen their captain Antonio Rattin controversially handed a straight red card for arguing with the referee.
It has been claimed that there was a plot for England to win the World Cup, and the referee from this game was German, while the official in Germany’s quarter final win over Uruguay was English. The controversy continued in the final with Geoff Hurst’s famous ‘was it over the line?’ goal.
Joao Havelange, who was FIFA President from 1974 until 1998 is certain to have further fuelled these conspiracy theories by openly stating that the 1966 and ’74 World Cups were fixed.
"In the three matches that the Brazilian national team played in 1966, of the three referees and six linesmen, seven were British and two were Germans," Havelange told Folha de Sao Paulo.
"Brazil went out, Pele ‘exited’ through injury [following some rough defensive play], and England and Germany entered into the final, just as the Englishman Sir Stanley Rous, who was the President of FIFA at the time, had wanted.
"In Germany in 1974 the same thing happened. During the Brazil-Holland match, the referee was German, we lost 2-0 and Germany won the title," said Havelange.
"We were the best in the world, and had the same team that had won the World Cup in 1962 in Chile and 1970 in Mexico, but it was planned for the host countries to win.”
World Cup hosts have been at the centre of many conspiracy claims over the year. In 1978 Argentina needed to beat Copa America holders Peru by four clear goals to reach the final ahead of Brazil. They won 6-0 but their were dark rumours that Peru, who had an Argentine-born goalkeeper, had thrown the game. Meanwhile in 2002, minnows South Korea were at the centre of similar claims as they finished fourth after seeing a host of dubious decisions go their way in the victories over Italy and Spain.
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=753029
Its all over other sites as well as some TV stations. I always had a feeling 66 was rigged man. No really even when I talk with people from that era I always quiz them most of them say it seemed as if most referee calls where in favor of England. I had mentioned on here a long time ago that 66 was fixed but I was attacked by an English mob.
What are your thoughts, I think this has some truth in it. Why would the guy come out and make up something on such a scale.
Shame on England a Germany. England's only world cup win was fixed? :lol:
-
this may explain why holland didnt win in 1974, we were way better, but the germans won on the german way
-
Everything in that article sounds like calls that are made in every tournament. There's always a controversial goal or red card.
If those two tournaments were fixed, then please tell me what 2002 was? If 66 and 74 are going to make news but 02 is not, then I don't give a shit about this news story.
-
as adi says it sounds like utter bullshit. and yes id say this even if it wasnt my country involved. many many things could be 'fixed' if based on the arguements used here. if you annalyse any WC where the hosts win, youll see many dubious decisions where the hosts are involved. does that mean its fixed? no, it means its a football match refereed by humans who fuck up and these decisions happen in any game. if the hosts arent involved, human error, if the hosts are, tounament fixing... is that what youre saying? because im sure there were many dubious happenings in the same WCs that just werent covered. everything is ad hoc, linking things afterwards that fit the facts to create a hypothesis that should in no way be believed in at face value. again, im not saying this because im english, i couldnt care less about our win (fake or not ;))
-
meh dont really care seeing as it as 42 and 46 yrs ago and even if it was proven that they were fixed, please tell me what would FIFA do? Just leave those 2 tournaments out of history saying they were "undecided"
i care about 2010
-
2002 was fixed FOR SURE!
-
yea 02 was 1 of the gayest sports tournaments ive ever seen
-
How was 02 fixed? Brasil just beat the shit out of Germany, that's all. And that article is weak, get that shit out of here. People just like controversy and shit..
-
How was 02 fixed? Brasil just beat the shit out of Germany, that's all. And that article is weak, get that shit out of here. People just like controversy and shit..
The 02' fixings were about the messed up calls teams like Italy and Spain had when they played against Korea( the hosts of 02 WC along with Japan). I gotta agree that World Cup was one of the worst sporting tournaments in general, I had stayed home to watch the Italy vs Korea game and I shut off my tv because of how crappy the reffing and the game was, it takes a lot to make a 10 year old kid turn off a tv :'< The Spain vs Korea game was pretty bogus too, I don't like the idea of these kind of events being fixed but some of the ways these things go down makes you really wonder :angry:
Edit: That being said I wouldn't mind seeing an African nation do well in a world cup... 2010 maybe ??!
-
lets be honest, noone likes england, (cough mostly out of jealousy) so everytime they actually do something (cough rarely) ppl try to play it down or take it away from them.
fixed i doubt it from back in 66, its nothing compared to modern sport. modern sport is a disgrace! so many games are rigged and fixed, and players cheat and are wanjkers.
the olden days were the days where men were actually men, not pussies.
goodbyexx
-
How was 02 fixed? Brasil just beat the shit out of Germany, that's all. And that article is weak, get that shit out of here. People just like controversy and shit..
If you base the entire tournament only on the final, than I guess you have a point.
-
How was 02 fixed? Brasil just beat the shit out of Germany, that's all. And that article is weak, get that shit out of here. People just like controversy and shit..
If you base the entire tournament only on the final, than I guess you have a point.
For me the only controversy was Korea's win over Spain. Brazil had a great team, legitimately better than any other team in the tpurnament. The 3 R's were unstoppable, and they won.
-
How was 02 fixed? Brasil just beat the shit out of Germany, that's all. And that article is weak, get that shit out of here. People just like controversy and shit..
If you base the entire tournament only on the final, than I guess you have a point.
For me the only controversy was Korea's win over Spain. Brazil had a great team, legitimately better than any other team in the tpurnament. The 3 R's were unstoppable, and they won.
naaa spain were just shit like they have always been.
i dont believe anything goal.com has they are obessesed with farce rumours of players always moving to milan and juventus. just like to get my hopes up like believing what they publish just like believing santa and the sasquatch.
-
the '66 world cup was rigged crearly. everyone says it. also the '78 cup in argentina is the biggest rigged cup in the history of football.
argentina were to face peru and brazil would face another team. back in the old rules brazil only needed a draw to win the cup. and argentina would have to beat peru who were better then them at that time. argentina's match was changed so they could play after brazil played.
-
the '66 world cup was rigged crearly. everyone says it. also the '78 cup in argentina is the biggest rigged cup in the history of football.
argentina were to face peru and brazil would face another team. back in the old rules brazil only needed a draw to win the cup. and argentina would have to beat peru who were better then them at that time. argentina's match was changed so they could play after brazil played.
Yeah, I'm not to familiar with the older world cups, but wasn't it that Argentina had to beat Peru by 4 goals and at that time Argentina wasn't the stronger of teams yet managed to pull a 6-0 win to advance?
When you want to look at all the world cups they all have surprises and messed up outcomes for the most part so you can't say they're all rigged or something, it just looks like some countries manage to play some messed up games lol or at least it would seem.
Either way Poland for 2010 :popcorn:
-
noo the reason for weird scorelines back in the days were from the standards. football wasnt taken as seriously with all the issues of diet tactics and living style like they are now.
if u look at the greats from the 60s some of the goals they scored look not so good to the modern eye, but at the time they were a heck of a goal. the standards of defenders in general werenot so good backthen too
-
Nah sonny I disagree. I think a collect of players from back in the day are much tougher than players today, with those heavy boots, balls, pitch conditions and kits. Not to mention all the fouls the referees used to allow most footballers today are pussies. I've seen the fitness training from the 60~s it was intense stuff running outside in the freezing cold and wet topless.Those guys seemed to be tougher than nails. Take them from that era and allow them to play in these conditions it would be easier for them. And if you where to take todays players back to those conditions they would struggle.
-
yeah players like Garrincha, Pele, Beckenbauer, Best, Charlton, and Cruyff woyld've been great in any era
-
yes maybe fitness wise they were tougher and more manly back then (as i said), but if u look at the levels of skill esp. defensively it wasnt that good. its evolution of sport.
-
the '66 world cup was rigged crearly. everyone says it. also the '78 cup in argentina is the biggest rigged cup in the history of football.
argentina were to face peru and brazil would face another team. back in the old rules brazil only needed a draw to win the cup. and argentina would have to beat peru who were better then them at that time. argentina's match was changed so they could play after brazil played.
Yeah, I'm not to familiar with the older world cups, but wasn't it that Argentina had to beat Peru by 4 goals and at that time Argentina wasn't the stronger of teams yet managed to pull a 6-0 win to advance?
When you want to look at all the world cups they all have surprises and messed up outcomes for the most part so you can't say they're all rigged or something, it just looks like some countries manage to play some messed up games lol or at least it would seem.
Either way Poland for 2010 :popcorn:
yeah and at that time peru were the best team in south america after brazil. then they had a huge earth quake. argentina promised them aid. then argentina beat them 6-0 funny huh
-
There is always going to be a conspiracy theory when the host wins. Crowds could influence referee decisions too you know. I know from experience on both sides. But as it was said before these tournaments were a long time ago. Let's focus and the one that's approaching :cheers:
-
There is always going to be a conspiracy theory when the host wins. Crowds could influence referee decisions too you know. I know from experience on both sides. But as it was said before these tournaments were a long time ago. Let's focus and the one that's approaching :cheers:
south africa??? cos thats aaages away and in doubt
-
2 years isnt ages away at all
and even if they do move it the 2010 date wont be removed or changed
-
yer it is! it is an age seeming as someone says lets focus on it, when the euros has just finished.
u can accomplish soo much in 2 years time.
think about it. if u get laid more than 2 times a day. u will have had sex about 1500 times in 2 years!
-
which man could take 1500 "laids" in 2 yrs
the human body cannot produce that much fluid
nothing would come out after 750
-
its only sex 2 times a day everyday
-
you people are weird