Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum

Freestyle Soccer Forum => Freestyle Videos => Topic started by: Baruzdin on Apr 04, 2008, 03:07: AM

Title: New trick ???
Post by: Baruzdin on Apr 04, 2008, 03:07: AM

Please comments
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: SeBaS on Apr 04, 2008, 03:11: AM
you mean at the beginning??? if so it was only a combo. rev.tb to rev.tb
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Jonathonhehu on Apr 04, 2008, 04:03: AM
i think we can call this an official trick
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Baruzdin on Apr 04, 2008, 04:19: AM
BTB - BaruzdinTouBounce (rtb to rtb)
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Mike on Apr 04, 2008, 07:37: AM
BTB - BaruzdinTouBounce (rtb to rtb)
no :cursing: , this is obviously just a non-touch combo, or just rtbs in a row. No naming the combo!!
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Leha on Apr 04, 2008, 07:40: AM
BTB - BaruzdinTouBounce (rtb to rtb)
no :cursing: , this is obviously just a non-touch combo, or just rtbs in a row. No naming the combo!!
all new ticks are combo... but I don't say that all of them must named by 'creators'
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Martin on Apr 04, 2008, 08:11: AM
BTB - BaruzdinTouBounce (rtb to rtb)
no :cursing: , this is obviously just a non-touch combo, or just rtbs in a row. No naming the combo!!
all new ticks are combo... but I don't say that all of them must named by 'creators'

No, they arent. What about Dore atw for example? What for a combo is that? Kinda stupid to say that every new tricks are combos as an excuse to name a trick after yourself. I mean, its about the same as if someone had done two alternating crossovers and claimed it as a new trick?
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Jonathonhehu on Apr 04, 2008, 08:21: AM
this trick deserves a name  :cheers: and mike mu dont know what ur talking about
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Thomas on Apr 04, 2008, 08:41: AM
It's not new
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Leha on Apr 04, 2008, 07:17: PM
BTB - BaruzdinTouBounce (rtb to rtb)
no :cursing: , this is obviously just a non-touch combo, or just rtbs in a row. No naming the combo!!
all new ticks are combo... but I don't say that all of them must named by 'creators'

No, they arent. What about Dore atw for example? What for a combo is that? Kinda stupid to say that every new tricks are combos as an excuse to name a trick after yourself. I mean, its about the same as if someone had done two alternating crossovers and claimed it as a new trick?
sorry, I've meant that almost all...
heh, I agree, people must name it, but not creator...
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Mike on Apr 04, 2008, 08:17: PM
this trick deserves a name  :cheers: and mike mu dont know what ur talking about
I know what I'm talking about, do you? State why or your going to be known as the big faggot who knows nothing.

it should not be named since:

This is just rtbs in a row with different feet

If this is named then cross cross should be a trick

people need to value what's better; being named or just be said in the technical version because what makes the most sense; rtb-rtb nt different feet or BaruzdinToeBounce?

when someone does three rtbs in a row, that should as well be named after him if this one does.

the two rtbs in a row could as well have been with the same foot, doesn't that "trick" deserve a name too then?

People need to stop bitching about making up new tricks and naming it after themself. It makes me wanna puke.
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: SeBaS on Apr 04, 2008, 09:39: PM
this trick deserves a name  :cheers: and mike mu dont know what ur talking about
I know what I'm talking about, do you? State why or your going to be known as the big faggot who knows nothing.

it should not be named since:

This is just rtbs in a row with different feet

If this is named then cross cross should be a trick

people need to value what's better; being named or just be said in the technical version because what makes the most sense; rtb-rtb nt different feet or BaruzdinToeBounce?

when someone does three rtbs in a row, that should as well be named after him if this one does.

the two rtbs in a row could as well have been with the same foot, doesn't that "trick" deserve a name too then?

People need to stop bitching about making up new tricks and naming it after themself. It makes me wanna puke.
true this is just a normal combo
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Golomejic on Apr 04, 2008, 10:13: PM
I didn't watch this but Mike is right.
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Chris-C on Apr 04, 2008, 10:18: PM
Mafioso can you please make your signature 300x100  :biggrin: It just looks tidyer on the forum... Thanks
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Golomejic on Apr 04, 2008, 10:19: PM
Mafioso was here?!!
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Mike on Apr 04, 2008, 10:26: PM
I didn't watch this but Mike is right.
that is the kind of posts I like  :pimp:

good day to you, sir.
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Baruzdin on Apr 05, 2008, 04:21: AM
ok, rtb-rtb nt
sorry guys.
Combo nice rtb-rtb nt?
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Jonathonhehu on Apr 05, 2008, 05:48: AM
almost every fucking trick is a combo
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: SeBaS on Apr 05, 2008, 07:21: AM
almost every fucking trick is a combo
lol he already accepted its not a new trick.  :cheers:
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: Mike on Apr 05, 2008, 09:48: AM
almost every fucking trick is a combo
hahahaha, great comeback. Looks like you're the one who doesn't know what in god´s name you're talking about

oh, I like your attitude. And yeah, nice style on the rtb-rtb (nt)
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: oLi on Apr 06, 2008, 02:47: AM
.Looks awesome but no new trick just a combo, sorry.
Title: Re: New trick ???
Post by: 19mossi on Apr 06, 2008, 12:21: PM
its just a combo mate  :cheers: