Beyond Football - Freestyle Football Forum
Freestyle Soccer Forum => Freestyle Videos => Topic started by: Miran Pirner on Sep 25, 2010, 06:38: AM
-
Tsukasa around the world (Tsatw) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93cbBlg-qG0#)
-
Nice :)
DanTheMan should be able to do this easy enough I think :)
-
i think its a combo
-
for me this is no new, is hhj+three6tytouzaniatw, nice combo!!!
and very clean, tsukasa is amazing
-
really nice and stylish combo
-
it's a combo hhjatw-360tatw nt
-
it's combo man :D
-
good combo Tsukasa :PDT_Armataz_01_37:
-
Nice Bro!
-
Combo?
-
it's a combo hhjatw-360tatw nt
the first part is not hhjatw, it´s outside atw-reverse crossover (nt)
but they are very similar
-
what is the change? atw out rev cross nt is hhjatw, and in the air is jatw. wtf you think ?
-
what is the change? atw out rev cross nt is hhjatw, and in the air is jatw. wtf you think ?
no..
hhjatw = atw hatw nt
This is atw rev cross nt...
half is the definition of not touch the ball with the foot you did the trick with.. like hatw - you do atw with right but take it with left...
so fx. taatw is hhtw-tatw nt
and beck atw is hhjatw-tatw nt
I think so.. lol
-
u are in the problem licht, hhjatw is atw rev cross nt because u do atw and rev cross with same foot!!!
-
stylish but it was a combo
and i loved
-
EVERYBODY KNOWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ITS A BECK ATW! :cheesy:
-
sick dude! :D
but tbh, I dont think you should call it atw,
becouse its only a fucking nice nt combo!
hatw-reversecross(nt)-360atatw(nt)
totally sick anyways!
-
Combo?
yeah (Y)
COMBO
-
tbh i dont really like it :S doesnt flow too well imo
-
sick dude! :D
but tbh, I dont think you should call it atw,
becouse its only a fucking nice nt combo!
hatw-reversecross(nt)-360atatw(nt)
totally sick anyways!
omg calle brow, atatw and hatw rev cross nt? :sign0065:
big mac this very similar a beck only that 360 tatw, and guy for final time atw rev cross nt+360tatw all with same foot, wtf hatw the he do is hhj+360tatw or atw rev cross nt+360tatw
-
sick dude! :D
but tbh, I dont think you should call it atw,
becouse its only a fucking nice nt combo!
hatw-reversecross(nt)-360atatw(nt)
totally sick anyways!
omg calle brow, atatw and hatw rev cross nt? :sign0065:
big mac this very similar a beck only that 360 tatw, and guy for final time atw rev cross nt+360tatw all with same foot, wtf hatw the he do is hhj+360tatw or atw rev cross nt+360tatw
I don't understand a word what you say..
-
All these names are ridiculous. It's just a variation. Too many names to keep up with
-
wait how is this not hhjatw-360tatw nt?
can someone explain, sorry i misunderstand naming lower combos, but im positive thats hhjatw-360tatw nt
(im probably wrong)
-
sick dude! :D
but tbh, I dont think you should call it atw,
becouse its only a fucking nice nt combo!
hatw-reversecross(nt)-360atatw(nt)
totally sick anyways!
omg calle brow, atatw and hatw rev cross nt? :sign0065:
big mac this very similar a beck only that 360 tatw, and guy for final time atw rev cross nt+360tatw all with same foot, wtf hatw the he do is hhj+360tatw or atw rev cross nt+360tatw
I don't understand a word what you say..
same
-
como BECK pero con 360 xd
-
u are in the problem licht, hhjatw is atw rev cross nt because u do atw and rev cross with same foot!!!
you are right xixo
-
it's a combo hhjatw-360tatw nt
the first part is not hhjatw, it´s outside atw-reverse crossover (nt)
but they are very similar
they are the same thing
-
Combo! Nice!
-
what the heck who cares if it was combo or single trick :sign0099:
the point is tsukasa is amazing
thanks for the post miran ;)
-
That was awesome! Really cool.
it's combo man :D
-
I don't want to drag another argument in here. But if this is a combo, then OK, let's put it this way:
Beck ATW = ATW rev co nt TATW
TATW = ATW co nt (in a specific way).
So, if this can be broken down into a combo, then you guys should do that for any other trick as well, which means, ultimately:
"There is no new trick."
-
Oh Shit! Amazing
-
sick dude! :D
but tbh, I dont think you should call it atw,
becouse its only a fucking nice nt combo!
hatw-reversecross(nt)-360atatw(nt)
totally sick anyways!
omg calle brow, atatw and hatw rev cross nt? :sign0065:
big mac this very similar a beck only that 360 tatw, and guy for final time atw rev cross nt+360tatw all with same foot, wtf hatw the he do is hhj+360tatw or atw rev cross nt+360tatw
I don't understand a word what you say..
same
Same :) :PDT_Armataz_01_37:
-
I don't want to drag another argument in here. But if this is a combo, then OK, let's put it this way:
Beck ATW = ATW rev co nt TATW
TATW = ATW co nt (in a specific way).
So, if this can be broken down into a combo, then you guys should do that for any other trick as well, which means, ultimately:
"There is no new trick."
I agree with the beck atw, but your example is just a mistake from the previous generations of freestyle. Why should we continue making the same mistake in this era?
The earlier we stop, the better.
-
everyone stop with the new name bs... the Japs dont use the same names for tricks as us, so they arent on the same page...
lets stop arguing, its a combo and there we go :)
-
ok i think this tsatw is a combo not a move. it looks great though.
just to clear things up
is hhjatw the same as atw-rco nt?
if that's the way then tatw is definitely atw-co nt
hhjatw is one movement
the atw - rco nt in beck atw looks like two
to me, those combos that skora do, atw-rco nt-rco nt-rco nt etc... are not hhjatw nt-rco nt-rco nt etc... that guy from poland who does a lot of arhjatw does hhjatw a lot, not atw-rco nt.
so to me hhjatw is not the same as atw-rco nt because tatw is not the same as atw-co nt. anyone on the same page as me? :017:
-
well... i don´t think hhjatw and atw- rco (nt) are the same
if they would be the same, half (outside) htw and rco would also be the same
but when u do rco u jump a lil bit, when u do half (outside) htw u don´t jump
so if u do atw-rco (nt) u jump, when u do hhjatw u don´t jump;)
btw i think this trick is like a beck atw with a 360 in the middle;)
-
yes royal but eh do hhj no atw rev cross nt and i go for chat.
-
cool combo
and can everyone stfu about this gay hhj w.e the fuck shit :098:
-
I don't want to drag another argument in here. But if this is a combo, then OK, let's put it this way:
Beck ATW = ATW rev co nt TATW
TATW = ATW co nt (in a specific way).
So, if this can be broken down into a combo, then you guys should do that for any other trick as well, which means, ultimately:
"There is no new trick."
There are new tricks in sitdowns
0:53
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGhpxnRFNVg
really.. youre not gonna call that some shit like 360 heel spin